Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32935019›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2018

Multi-province epidemiological research using linked administrative data: a case study from Canada.

Amanda Leanne Butler, Mark Smith, Wayne Jones, Carol E Adair, Simone N Vigod, Alain Lesage, Paul Kurdyak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Evolution of Psychiatric Epidemiology: Where to Next?Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring barriers and solutions in advancing cross-centre population data science.International journal of population data science · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda Leanne ButlerFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, B.C. Canada V5A 1S6.
Mark SmithManitoba Centre for Health Policy Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences #408-727 McDermot Ave. University of Manitoba Bannatyne Campus, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5 Canada.
Wayne JonesCentre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction (CARMHA) SFU Faculty of Health Sciences 515 W. Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3.
Carol E AdairDepartment of Community Health Sciences TRW Building, Room 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Simone N VigodWomen's College Research Institute, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada.
Alain LesageDepartment of Psychology, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, 90 avenue Vincent d'Indy, Montréal QC H2V 2S9.
Paul KurdyakICES, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada has a publicly-funded universal healthcare system with information systems managed by 13 different provinces and territories. This context creates inconsistencies in data collection and challenges for research or surveillance conducted at the national or multi-jurisdictional level.

objectiveUsing a recent Canadian research project as a case study, we document the strengths and challenges of using administrative health data in a multi-jurisdictional context. We discuss the implications of using different health information systems and the solutions we adopted to deal with variations. Our goal is to contribute to better understanding of these challenges and the development of a more integrated and harmonized approach to conducting multi-jurisdictional research using administrative data. CONTEXT AND MODEL: Using data from five separate provincial healthcare data systems, we sought to create and report on a set of provincially-comparable mental health and addiction services performance indicators. In this paper, we document the research process, challenges, and solutions. Finally, we conclude by making recommendations for investment in national infrastructure that could help cut costs, broaden scope, and increase use of administrative health data that exists in Canada.

conclusionsCanada has an incredible wealth of administrative data that resides in 13 territorial and provincial government systems. Navigating access and improving comparability across these systems has been an ongoing challenge for the past 20 years, but progress is being made. We believe that with some investment, a more harmonized and integrated information network could be developed that supports a broad range of surveillance and research activities with strong policy and program implications.

Identifiers

PMID32935019
PMCPMC7299461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.