The politics of staying behind the frontline of coronavirus.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations.Public health · 2021
   Pooled it
2. Watching you wear out: Time as clinical labor.Medical anthropology quarterly · 2026
   Article
3. Historicising "containment and delay": COVID-19, the NHS and high-risk patients.Wellcome open research · 2020
   Article
4. 'Containment, delay, mitigation': waiting and care in the time of a pandemic.Wellcome open research · 2020
   Article
5. Lockdown and adolescent mental health: reflections from a child and adolescent psychotherapist.Wellcome open research · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as