Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934880›Full record

ReviewOncoimmunology2020

Current Clinical Evidence and Potential Solutions to Increase Benefit of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Marion Alcantara, Pauline Du Rusquec, Emanuela Romano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Beyond "Copy/Paste".Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. CAR T cells: Building on the CD19 paradigm.European journal of immunology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marion AlcantaraCenter for Cancer Immunotherapy, INSERM U932, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Pauline Du RusquecDpt of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Emanuela RomanoCenter for Cancer Immunotherapy, INSERM U932, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cells has shown unprecedented clinical efficacy for hematological malignancies. Recently two CAR T-cell based therapeutics, Kymriah (Tisagenlecleucel) and Yescarta (Axicabtagene ciloleucel) were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Medicines Agency. Despite the progress in treating hematological malignancies, challenges remain for the use of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with solid tumors. Barriers yet to overcome for achieving effective CAR T-cell therapy include antigenic heterogeneity of solid tumors, an immune-suppressive microenvironment, and organ-specific properties that limit T-cell entry. This review will summarize available clinical data for CAR T-cell therapy in solid tumors, including present obstacles and promising strategies to advancement.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentUnited Statesadoptive cell therapyCAR T-cellschimeric antigen receptorsolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID32934880
PMCPMC7466853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.