ArticleOncology letters2020
Significance of age-associated quality of life in patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent endocrine therapy in Japan.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-state utility of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in Vietnam: A multicenter cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors in Relation to Age, Type of Surgery and Length of Time since First Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Differences in the Relationships Between Muscle Strength, Muscle Mass, Balance Function, and Quality of Life for Middle-Aged and Older Breast Cancer Survivors.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, when determining treatment regimens, there is an emphasis on the quality of life (QOL), in addition to treatment efficacy. Especially in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases, unless death is imminent, a common first-line treatment is endocrine therapy, which has fewer side effects. In the present study, the differences in QOL were evaluated based on the age and prognostic indicators of 46 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases (stage IV), who received first-line endocrine therapy at the Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between November 2007 and November 2016. QOL score before and after endocrine therapy was retrospectively analyzed, using the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs-Breast (QOL-ACD-B). There was no significant association between age and any of the clinicopathological features investigated. However, the QOL score of the elderly patient group was significantly higher compared with that of the younger group in the 'Satisfaction with treatment and coping with disease' subcategory (P=0.008). The QOL score of the younger age group in the same subcategory was significantly improved by the treatment (P=0.013). The patients that had an increased overall QOL score 3 months after treatment initiation had a significant extension of progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared to the patients with decreased or no change in QOL (P=0.032). In conclusion, psychological stress was more prominent in younger patients with stage IV breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy compared with elderly patients. Importantly, improving QOL within the 3 months after treatment initiation could lead to longer PFS rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.