ArticleOccupational therapy international2020
Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals in Lebanon.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Navigating Cognitive Screening and Service Delivery for Sensory Impairment in Occupational Therapy.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties and clinical usability of the cognition in daily life scale in patients with acquired brain injury in clinical care settings.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Preliminary Study of the Utility of the Menu Task in an Acute Care Setting.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Article
- Recommending 24-hour attendant care: A qualitative study exploring the clinical decision-making process of occupational therapists in Ontario, Canada.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Functional cognitive performance augments cognitive screening data in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Occupational Therapy Assessment Tools for Children and Adolescents in Iran: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Turning the spotlight on assessment of severe cognitive impairment: Reducing disparity and inequality in stroke care.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2023Article
- Clinical practices, challenges, and job satisfaction of occupational therapists working in Community Mental Health Centers in Turkey.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2023Article
- Telerehabilitation use and experiences in occupational and physical therapy through the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2023Article
- Identification and Use of Assessment Tools in Spanish Occupational Therapists: An Exploratory Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. 323 occupational therapists from a wide range of clinical practice areas participated in the study. A large number of therapists used noncognitive specific assessments with a focus on functional approaches. The most commonly used standardized assessments were the COPM (56.7%), followed by MMSE (54.2%) and MoCA (45.5%), while the nonstandardized assessments were clinical observation (38.4%) and generic ADL assessment (34.1%). The use of main assessments was significantly different across world regions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.