Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934597›Full record

ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2020

Solidarity or self-interest? Public opinion in relation to alcohol policies in Sweden.

David Karlsson, Sören Holmberg, Lennart Weibull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Grey Market for Alcohol on Social Media in Sweden.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Concepts and conditions for knowledge production.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2020
    Article
  8. Opinions on alcohol policy in Sweden.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David KarlssonUniversity of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-4843
Sören HolmbergUniversity of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lennart WeibullUniversity of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this article is to study how people sometimes accept policies that could in a narrow sense be seen as in conflict with their own self-interest.

designThe study is based on survey data relating to public opinion on alcohol policy in Sweden targeted at people aged 16-85 years 2016-2017. Among the 3400 people questioned, the response rate was 52%.

resultsThe results show that people's perception of the problematic societal consequences of alcohol, in combination with ideological norms regarding the responsibility of individuals, is much more important in explaining public opinion than self-interest factors. It is the view that there is a problem at the societal level, rather than at the personal level, that is most essential for explaining opinions on alcohol restrictions. General knowledge of alcohol-related matters has some effect, whereas personal experiences of close affiliates excessive drinking does not seem to color the opinions expressed.

conclusionSupport for restrictive alcohol policies in Swedish public opinion is mainly founded on norms of solidarity and astute problem analyses at the societal level, and to a much lesser extent on egoism and personal experiences.

Indexed as

alcohol consumptionalcohol policiesideologyproblem perceptionpublic opinionself-interestSweden

Identifiers

PMID32934597
PMCPMC7434170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.