Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934565›Full record

ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2019

Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches.

Charlotte Gedeon, Mikael Sandell, Inge Birkemose, Johan Kakko, Valgerður Rúnarsdóttir, Kaarlo Simojoki, Thomas Clausen, Fred Nyberg, Richard Littlewood, Hannu Alho

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Charlotte GedeonSolstenen Addiction Centre, Skåne, Sweden.
Mikael SandellCapio Maria, Stockholm and Skåne, Sweden.
Inge BirkemoseOdense Kommune, Misbrugsbehandling, Denmark.
Johan KakkoUmeå University, Sweden.
Valgerður RúnarsdóttirSAA's Vogur Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kaarlo SimojokiHelsinki University Hospital, Finland A-Clinic Foundation/A-clinic oy, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Thomas ClausenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Norway.
Fred NybergUppsala University, Sweden.
Richard Littlewoodapplied strategic, London, UK.
Hannu AlhoAbdominal Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FICapio Lundby Sjukhus · SEInternational Institute for Strategic Studies · GBOdense Municipality · DKSociety of Alcoholism and other Addictions · ISUmeå University · SEUniversity of Oslo · NOUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOutcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard.

methodEvidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country.

resultsEvidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community.

conclusionThere are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD.

Indexed as

comparisonDenmarkFinlandIcelandNorwayopioid use disorderSweden

Identifiers

PMID32934565
PMCPMC7434162
OpenAlexW2911275160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.