ArticleNordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT2017
Psychometric properties of the UngDOK: A structured interview for adolescents with substance-use problems.
Article in Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes of Adolescent Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Problems: Exploring the Co-occurrence of Mental Health and Substance Use Problems.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024Article
- The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) used with adolescents - methodological report from clinical and community samples.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2022Article
- Adolescents with substance use problems in outpatient treatment: a one-year prospective follow-up study focusing on mental health and gender differences.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2022Article
- Long-Term Outcomes for Young People With Substance Use Problems in Outpatient Treatment: Gender-Specific Patterns.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Mental health problems among young people in substance abuse treatment in Sweden.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020Article
- Clinical characteristics distinguishing tramadol-using adolescents from other substance-using adolescents in an out-patient treatment setting.Addictive behaviors reports · 2020Article
- Gender differences among adolescents with substance abuse problems at Maria clinics in Sweden.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis article describes and discusses the Swedish UngDOK interview and its psychometric properties.
methodThe study is based on empirical data from 1633 intake interviews collected by 15 units in ten cities and focused primarily on the two central sections of intake form: alcohol and drug use and mental health. The statistical analyses concern internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity and internal non-response.
resultsThe reliability of AUDIT-C and the mental health domain was good with regard to both internal consistency and test-retest. The test-retest values were generally satisfactory, except for frequency of drug use and association with peers who use drugs. The discriminant validity shows that the interview clearly distinguishes adolescents with more profound problems from a group with milder problems and that a minor degree of inconsistency and non-response bias may occur in empirical material based upon self-reported information.
conclusionThe study showed that the psychometric properties of the UngDOK interview are generally satisfactory and may be regarded as a valuable option for practices engaged in treating adolescents with substance-use problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.