ReviewColoproctology2020
[Guidelines: neurogenic bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury (long version)].
Review in Coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for long-term follow-up care of secondary health conditions in spinal cord injury/disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- [The paraplegic patient-Characteristics of diagnostics and treatment in visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The guidelines (AWMF register number: 179-004) on neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) in spinal cord injury of the German-speaking Medical Society for Paraplegiology is addressed to all persons who care for people with congenital or acquired paraplegia with NBD. In particular, doctors, nurses and therapists are addressed. The multiprofessionally developed guidelines (involving neurourologists, visceral surgeons, gastroenterologists, health and nursing staff, nutritionists and associated professional societies in the review process) provides practical support for the care of patients with NBD. Definitions and up to date knowledge on the diagnostics of NBD as well as on the necessary conservative bowel management are conveyed in order to ensure the competent treatment of patients with NBD. The concept of NBD and its clinical implications are described. Drug interventions and surgical procedures are explained in brief and recommendations are given. The main objective of the present guidelines is to prevent complications including fecal incontinence and constipation and thus to positively influence the quality of life of those affected. Helpful appendices, which can be used in everyday life, complete the guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.