Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Horizontal 'gene drives' harness indigenous bacteria for bioremediation.

Katherine E French, Zhongrui Zhou, Norman Terry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genome-resolved analysis of Serratia marcescens strain SMTT infers niche specialization as a hydrocarbon-degrader.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Synthetic microbiology in sustainability applications.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine E FrenchDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Koshland Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. katherine.french@berkeley.edu.
Zhongrui ZhouQB3, University of California Berkeley, Stanley Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Norman TerryDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Koshland Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

A Zeiss Elyra S1 Structured Illumination Microscope for the Biological Imaging FaS10OD018136 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RUZIN, STEVEN EARL · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD018136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineering bacteria to clean-up oil spills is rapidly advancing but faces regulatory hurdles and environmental concerns. Here, we develop a new technology to harness indigenous soil microbial communities for bioremediation by flooding local populations with catabolic genes for petroleum hydrocarbon degradation. Overexpressing three enzymes (almA, xylE, p450cam) in Escherichia coli led to degradation of 60-99% of target hydrocarbon substrates. Mating experiments, fluorescence microscopy and TEM revealed indigenous bacteria could obtain these vectors from E. coli through several mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), including conjugation and cytoplasmic exchange through nanotubes. Inoculating petroleum-polluted sediments with E. coli carrying the vector pSF-OXB15-p450camfusion showed that the E. coli cells died after five days but a variety of bacteria received and carried the vector for over 60 days after inoculation. Within 60 days, the total petroleum hydrocarbon content of the polluted soil was reduced by 46%. Pilot experiments show that vectors only persist in indigenous populations when under selection pressure, disappearing when this carbon source is removed. This approach to remediation could prime indigenous bacteria for degrading pollutants while providing minimal ecosystem disturbance.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBacteriaEcosystemEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrocarbonsPetroleumPetroleum PollutionSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrocarbonsPetroleumSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID32934307
PMCPMC7492276
OpenAlexW3087091501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.