Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Impact of ASA-score, age and learning curve on early outcome in the initiation phase of an oncological robotic colorectal program.

Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Sergiu I Iosivan, Theodoros Kolokotronis, Christine Förster, Stephan Eckert, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Sebastian Rehberg, Martin Krüger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hülya Sarikaya *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany.
Tahar Benhidjeb *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sergiu I IosivanDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany.
Theodoros KolokotronisDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christine FörsterInstitute of Pathology, Clinic Region Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Stephan EckertDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care-, Emergency- and Pain-Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ludwig WilkensInstitute of Pathology, Clinic Region Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Alaa NasserDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sebastian RehbergDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care-, Emergency- and Pain-Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Martin Krüger *Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jan Schulte Am Esch *Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Schildescher Str. 99, 33611, Bielefeld, Germany. jan.schulteamesch@evkb.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ASA score is known to be an independent predictor of complications and mortality following colorectal surgery. We evaluated early outcome in the initiation phase of a robotic oncological colorectal resection program in dependence of comorbidity and learning curve. 43 consecutive colorectal cancer patients (median age: 74 years) who underwent robotic surgery were firstly analysed defined by physical status (group A = ASA1 + 2; group B = ASA3). Secondly, outcome was evaluated relating to surgery date (group E: early phase; group L: late phase). There were no differences among groups A and B with regard to gender, BMI, skin-to-skin operative times (STS), N- and M-status, hospital-stay as well as overall rate of complications according to Dindo-Clavien and no one-year mortality. GroupA when compared to group B demonstrated significantly lower mean age (65.5 years ± 11.4 years vs 75.8 years  ± 8.9 years), T-stage and ICU-stay. When separately analyzed for patients age ICU-stay was comparable (> 75 years vs. < 75 years). Group E and L demonstrated comparable characteristics and early outcome except more frequent lymphatic fistulas in group E. STS was reduced in group L compared to group E. Beyond learning curve aspects in our series, we could demonstrate that patient's physical condition according to ASA rather than age may have an impact on early outcome in the initial phase of a robotic oncological colorectal program.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAgedAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID32934256
PMCPMC7493955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.