ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2020
The diagnostic value of
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approach to determine the diagnostic value and predictive factors of PET/CT in FUO and IUO patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical analysis of histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis in adults with fever of unknown origin: a retrospective study.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Article
- Distinguishing lymphoma from benign lymph node diseases in fever of unknown origin using PET/CT radiomics.EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Diagnostic efficacy and necessity of 18F-FDG PET/CT in fever of unknown origin: insights from a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Is Imaging Bacteria with PET a Realistic Option or an Illusion?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Transformation: fighting the past or building the new?Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the clinical significance of
methodsPatients with a fever who received an
resultsAmong the 89 included patients, 66 were diagnosed using
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.