Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32934019›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

A Multivariate Poisson Deep Learning Model for Genomic Prediction of Count Data.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, José Cricelio Montesinos-López, Pawan Singh, Nerida Lozano-Ramirez, Alberto Barrón-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, 28040, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-6547
José Cricelio Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT), Guanajuato, 36023, México.
Pawan SinghBiometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico.
Nerida Lozano-RamirezBiometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico.
Alberto Barrón-LópezDepartment of Animal Production (DPA), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Av. La Molina s/n La Molina, 15024, Lima, Perú.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Jalisco, México aml_uach2004@hotmail.com j.crossa@cgiar.org.
José CrossaBiometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico aml_uach2004@hotmail.com j.crossa@cgiar.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigm called genomic selection (GS) is a revolutionary way of developing new plants and animals. This is a predictive methodology, since it uses learning methods to perform its task. Unfortunately, there is no universal model that can be used for all types of predictions; for this reason, specific methodologies are required for each type of output (response variables). Since there is a lack of efficient methodologies for multivariate count data outcomes, in this paper, a multivariate Poisson deep neural network (MPDN) model is proposed for the genomic prediction of various count outcomes simultaneously. The MPDN model uses the minus log-likelihood of a Poisson distribution as a loss function, in hidden layers for capturing nonlinear patterns using the rectified linear unit (RELU) activation function and, in the output layer, the exponential activation function was used for producing outputs on the same scale of counts. The proposed MPDN model was compared to conventional generalized Poisson regression models and univariate Poisson deep learning models in two experimental data sets of count data. We found that the proposed MPDL outperformed univariate Poisson deep neural network models, but did not outperform, in terms of prediction, the univariate generalized Poisson regression models. All deep learning models were implemented in Tensorflow as back-end and Keras as front-end, which allows implementing these models on moderate and large data sets, which is a significant advantage over previous GS models for multivariate count data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGenomeGenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerPoisson Distributioncount data of wheat linesGenomic selection and genomic predictionGenPredmultivariate Poisson deep neural networkPoisson regression modelsShared data resourcesunivariate Poisson deep neural network

Identifiers

PMID32934019
PMCPMC7642922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.