ArticleRMD open2020
Multidisciplinary collaboration among young specialists: results of an international survey by the emerging EULAR network and other young organisations.
Article in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Menopausal Suicidality and Fragmented Care: A Qualitative Study of Carer and Clinician Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatology and paediatric rheumatology: insights from an international survey by EMEUNET.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Rebuilding the MarrowOnco · 2025Article
- Social media landscape: a cross-sectional survey of health professionals.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Organoids in Haematologic Research: Advances and Future Directions.Cell proliferation · 2025Review
- [Clinical efficacy of composite transplantation of fascia lata-anterolateral thigh flap in repairing complex defects after radical tumor resection in maxillofacial region].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Observational
- Pediatric rheumatology on social media: experts ensure accuracy, public drives engagement - a comparative analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Synergistic strategies: Optimizing outcomes through a multidisciplinary approach to clinical rounds.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Article
- Article
- Social media platforms: a primer for researchers.Reumatologia · 2021Article
- Human touch in digital education-a solution.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Multidisciplinary cooperative first aid model for the treatment of patients with pelvic and multiple fractures.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultidisciplinary collaboration is defined as a collective work involving multiple disciplines and is common in clinical care and research. Our aim was to describe current clinical and research collaboration among young specialists and to identify unmet needs in this area.
methodsAn online survey was disseminated by email and social media to members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, the Young Nephrologists' Platform, the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Emerging Rheumatologists and Researchers and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Junior Members.
resultsOf 303 respondents from 36 countries, 61% were female, 21% were aged below 30 years and 67% were aged 31-40 years. Young rheumatologists were the most represented (39%), followed by young nephrologists (24%), young paediatricians (20%), young allergologists (11%) then young internists (3%) and 3% other specialities. Collaborations were reported frequently by phone and email, also by various combined clinics while common local multidisciplinary meetings were uncommon. 96% would like to develop clinical research collaborations and 69% basic research collaborations. The majority of young specialists would be interested in online (84%) and/or 1-2 days (85%) common courses including case discussion (81%) and training workshops (85%), as well as webinars recorded with several specialists on a specific disease (96%).
conclusionsThis collaborative initiative highlighted wishes from young specialists for developing (1) regular local multidisciplinary meetings to discuss complex patients, (2) clinical research collaboration with combined grants and (3) multidisciplinary online projects such as common courses, webinars and apps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.