Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933961›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Six countries, six individuals: resourceful patients navigating medical records in Australia, Canada, Chile, Japan, Sweden and the USA.

Liz Salmi, Selina Brudnicki, Maho Isono, Sara Riggare, Cecilia Rodriquez, Louise K Schaper, Jan Walker, Tom Delbanco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patients' Access to Their Psychiatric Notes: Current Policies and Practices in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liz SalmiDepartment of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA lsalmi@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-7438
Selina BrudnickiUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maho IsonoInternational University of Health and Welfare, Ōtawara, Japan.
Sara RiggareHealth Informatics Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia RodriquezFundacion Me Muevo, Santiago, Chile.
Louise K SchaperHealth Informatics Society of Australia, Victoria, South Australia, Australia.
Jan WalkerDepartment of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-1200
Tom DelbancoDepartment of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of international standards, widely differing attitudes and laws, medical and social cultures strongly influence whether and how patients may access their medical records in various settings of care. Reviewing records, including the notes clinicians write, can help shape how people participate in their own care. Aided at times by new technologies, individual patients and care partners are repurposing existing tools and designing innovative, often 'low-tech' ways to collect, sort and interpret their own health information. To illustrate diverse approaches that individuals may take, six individuals from six nations offer anecdotes demonstrating how they are learning to collect, assess and benefit from their personal health information.

Indexed as

Health Records, PersonalMedical RecordsAustraliaCanadaChileHumansJapanSwedenethics (see medical ethics)general medicine (see internal medicine)health informaticsquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32933961
PMCPMC7493106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.