Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933960›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

Using the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) to identify the active ingredients of pharmacist interventions to improve non-hospitalised patient health outcomes.

Claire Scott, Mícheál de Barra, Marie Johnston, Marijn de Bruin, Neil Scott, Catriona Matheson, Christine Bond, Margaret C Watson

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identifying behavior change techniques (BCTs) in responsive feeding interventions to prevent childhood obesity-A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Claire ScottDental Clinical Effectiveness, NHS Education for Scotland, Dundee, UK claire.scott@nes.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1230-6253
Mícheál de BarraLife Sciences, Brunel University London, Middlesex, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-6214
Marie JohnstonHealth Psychology, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Marijn de BruinHealth Psychology, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Neil ScottMedical Statistics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Catriona MathesonFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Christine BondAcademic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK.
Margaret C WatsonStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBBrunel University of London · GBNHS Education for Scotland · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/1041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to identify which behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were present in intervention and control groups of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in a Cochrane systematic review.

settingThe RCTs included were conducted in community, primary and/or ambulatory-care settings.

participantsThe data set was derived from 86 RCTs from an interim update of the Cochrane review of the effectiveness of pharmacist services on non-hospitalised patient outcomes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the identification of BCTs scheduled for delivery in intervention and control groups of the RCTs. The secondary outcome measure was to identify which BCTs are not being utilised in intervention and control groups of the RCTs.

resultsThe intervention and control groups included 31 and 12 BCTs, respectively. The number of identifiable BCTs/study ranged from 0 to 12 in the intervention groups (mean 3.01 (SD 2.4)) and 0 to 6 in the control groups (mean 0.38 (SD 0.84)). The most commonly identified BCTs in the intervention groups were: instruction on how to perform the behaviour (55%, n=47) (also the most common BCT in control groups); problem solving (29%, n=25); information about health consequences (24%, n=21); social support (practical) (24%, n=21); and social support (unspecified) (23%, n=20) (the second most common BCT in control groups). Thirteen trials had no identifiable BCTs in either group.

conclusionThe pharmacist interventions presented in this study did not use the full range of available BCTs. Furthermore, the reporting of BCTs was incomplete for both intervention and control groups, thereby limiting the utility and reproducibility of the interventions. Future interventions should be designed and reported using relevant taxonomies and checklists for example, BCT taxonomy and TIDieR (the template for intervention description and replication).

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyPharmacistsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial Supportchange managementpublic healthquality in health carestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID32933960
PMCPMC7493093
OpenAlexW3049671075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.