Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933950›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Comparison of weight-based insulin titration (WIT) and glucose-based insulin titration using basal-bolus algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.

Xiaodan Zhang, Tong Zhang, Guangda Xiang, Wenbo Wang, Yanli Li, Tao Du, Yunjuan Zhao, Singla Sethiel Mosha, Wangen Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03220919 (Efficacy and Safety of Weight-Based Insulin Titration), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03220919 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Weight-Based Insulin Titration (WEB-IT) Regimen Compared With Glucose Level-based Regimen in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled500ConditionsEfficacy, Self, Adverse EffectArmsWeight-based, Glucose level-based
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodan ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tong ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangda XiangDepartment of Endocrinology, Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-2308
Wenbo WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanli LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao DuDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunjuan ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Singla Sethiel MoshaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wangen LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China liwg660@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1202-1576
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNPeking University Shougang Hospital · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CNWuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubcutaneous administration of insulin is the preferred method for achieving glucose control in non-critically ill patients with diabetes. Glucose-based titration protocols were widely applied in clinical practice. However, most of these algorithms are experience-based and there is considerable variability and complexity. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of a weight-based insulin titration algorithm versus glucose-based algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis randomized clinical trial was carried out at four centers in the South, Central and North China. Inpatients with T2DM were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weight-based and glucose-based insulin titration algorithms. The primary outcome was the length of time for reaching blood glucose (BG) targets (fasting BG (FBG) and 2-hour postprandial BG (2hBG) after three meals). The secondary outcome included insulin dose for achieving glycemic control and the incidence of hypoglycemia during hospitalization.

resultsBetween January 2016 and June 2019, 780 patients were screened, and 575 completed the trial (283 in the weight-based group and 292 in the glucose-based group). The lengths of time for reaching BG targets at four time points were comparable between two groups. FBG reached targets within 3 days and 2hBG after three meals within 4 days. There is no significant difference in insulin doses between two groups at the end of the study. The total daily dosage was about 1 unit/kg/day, and the ratio of basal-to-bolus was about 2:3 in both groups. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups, and severe hypoglycemia was not detected in either of the groups.

conclusionsWeight-based insulin titration algorithm is equally effective and safe in hospitalized patients with T2DM compared with glucose-based algorithm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03220919.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AlgorithmsBlood GlucoseChinaHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinglucoseinpatient diabetes managementinsulin dose managementweight

Identifiers

PMID32933950
PMCPMC7493103
OpenAlexW3087588943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.