Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933788›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery2020

You Have Control: aviation communication application for safety-critical times in surgery.

J A Hardie, R S Oeppen, G Shaw, C Holden, N Tayler, P A Brennan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Human factors in orthopaedic surgery: making the right decisions in complexity.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Competence and communication in the implementation of computer-assisted surgical planning].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J A HardieTrauma & Orthopaedic Department, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, GU16 7UJ, UK. Electronic address: John.hardie@nhs.net.
R S OeppenDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. Electronic address: rachel.oeppen@uhs.nhs.uk.
G ShawCaptain B777/787, C/o Critical Factors, 2 Melrose Avenue, Borehamwood, WD6 2BJ, UK. Electronic address: graham.shaw@criticalfactors.org.
C HoldenCaptain B777/787, C/o Critical Factors, 2 Melrose Avenue, Borehamwood, WD6 2BJ, UK. Electronic address: chris.holden@criticalfactors.org.
N TaylerCaptain B777/787, C/o Critical Factors, 2 Melrose Avenue, Borehamwood, WD6 2BJ, UK. Electronic address: neil.tayler@gmail.com.
P A BrennanMaxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK. Electronic address: Peter.brennan@porthosp.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk organisations (HRO), including aviation, undergo formal communication training, with emphasis on safety-critical moments. Such training is not widespread or mandatory in healthcare, and while there are many differences both share the 'human element' with circumstances leading to an increased risk of harm. A typical operating theatre consists of an operating surgeon, and an assisting surgeon, roles that may change throughout the course of a procedure. Similarly, a training aircraft or multi-crew cockpit (flight deck) has a pilot in control, or 'pilot flying', and a 'pilot not flying'. Both interact with wider teams, for example the scrub team and air traffic controllers, respectively. Surgical error is the second most prevalent cause of preventable harm to patients after drug errors. Every year in the UK National Health Service (NHS), there are typically 500 never events, 21,000 serious incidents, and many more episodes of physical or psychological harm. Ineffective communication (46%) is the most common behavioural factor leading to a never event. In this review, we examine the concept of 'sterile cockpit', use of unambiguous terminology, callsigns, important information readback, sharing of mental models, and the mini-brief, and how these may be used to reduce patient harm during safety-critical moments.

Indexed as

AviationState MedicineCommunicationHumansMedical ErrorsSafetyaviationCOVID-19human factorsnever eventpatient safetysurgery

Identifiers

PMID32933788
PMCPMC7449978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.