ReviewSeminars in oncology2020
Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of early stage breast cancer.
Review in Seminars in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEARL: A Phase Ib/II Biomarker Study of Adding Radiation Therapy to Pembrolizumab Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Trial
- Article
- Tumor microenvironment response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: insights from single-cell and spatial omics.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Global burden of female breast cancer: new estimates in 2022, temporal trend and future projections up to 2050 based on the latest release from GLOBOCAN.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Emerging immunologic approaches as cancer anti-angiogenic therapies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Comprehensive risk profiling and long-term cardiovascular toxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Bicalutamide Enhances Conventional Chemotherapy in In Vitro and In Vivo Assays Using Human and Canine Inflammatory Mammary Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- The Impact of the Introduction of the Breast Unit Model in a Northwestern Italian Region.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Integrating Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Practical Evidence-Based Considerations.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer Mortality in the Americas and Australasia over the Period 1980-2017 with Predictions for 2025.Biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advent of breast cancer screening programs, the majorities of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer are diagnosed with early stage disease and are likely to experience cure with proper treatment. Significant advances have been made in the management of early-stage breast cancer to personalize treatment according to disease biology. This progress has led to improvement in survival outcomes and quality of life for our patients. In this review, we discuss landmark clinical trials in medical oncology that have shaped the current standard of care for early stage ER-positive, HER2-positive, and triple negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.