ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
Deep learning based feature-level integration of multi-omics data for breast cancer patients survival analysis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence on the personalization of breast cancer management: a systematic study.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Survival prediction landscape: an in-depth systematic literature review on activities, methods, tools, diseases, and databases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Pooled it
- Application of deep learning in cancer epigenetics through DNA methylation analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- AI-based multimodal integration of genomics and electronic health records.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Handling missing modalities in multimodal survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Deep survival analysis in multimodal medical data: a parametric and probabilistic approach with competing risks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A powerful representation learning method for enhanced analysis of incomplete multi-omics data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- From classical machine learning to emerging foundation models: review on multimodal data integration for cancer research.Artificial intelligence review · 2026Article
- MCVAE-based multi-omic anomaly detection in Fragile X Syndrome.NAR molecular medicine · 2026Article
- DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Unlocking precision diagnostics: A multimodal framework integrating metabolomics with advanced machine learning techniques.PloS one · 2026Article
- The role of MiRNA-mediated tumor microenvironment in bone metastasis from a multi-omics perspective: cross-cancer mechanisms and clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- CoFormerSurv: Collaborative transformer for multi-omics survival analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- AI-driven multi-omics biomarkers in precision breast cancer therapeutics: from discovery to clinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Transforming multi-omics data into images for disease classification: A review of techniques and tools.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- From mechanistic models to artificial intelligence: exploring the potential of digital twins in geriatric oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Omics-to-Image Transformer Framework for Cancer Prognosis Prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- MOTLAB: A Weighted Multi-Omics Transfer Learning Approach to Mitigate Breast Cancer Racial Disparities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Harnessing plasma transcriptomics for non-invasive cancer biomarker identification: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2025Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most prevalent and among the most deadly cancers in females. Patients with breast cancer have highly variable survival lengths, indicating a need to identify prognostic biomarkers for personalized diagnosis and treatment. With the development of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing, multi-omics information are becoming available for a more thorough evaluation of a patient's condition. In this study, we aim to improve breast cancer overall survival prediction by integrating multi-omics data (e.g., gene expression, DNA methylation, miRNA expression, and copy number variations (CNVs)).
methodsMotivated by multi-view learning, we propose a novel strategy to integrate multi-omics data for breast cancer survival prediction by applying complementary and consensus principles. The complementary principle assumes each -omics data contains modality-unique information. To preserve such information, we develop a concatenation autoencoder (ConcatAE) that concatenates the hidden features learned from each modality for integration. The consensus principle assumes that the disagreements among modalities upper bound the model errors. To get rid of the noises or discrepancies among modalities, we develop a cross-modality autoencoder (CrossAE) to maximize the agreement among modalities to achieve a modality-invariant representation. We first validate the effectiveness of our proposed models on the MNIST simulated data. We then apply these models to the TCCA breast cancer multi-omics data for overall survival prediction.
resultsFor breast cancer overall survival prediction, the integration of DNA methylation and miRNA expression achieves the best overall performance of 0.641 ± 0.031 with ConcatAE, and 0.63 ± 0.081 with CrossAE. Both strategies outperform baseline single-modality models using only DNA methylation (0.583 ± 0.058) or miRNA expression (0.616 ± 0.057).
conclusionsIn conclusion, we achieve improved overall survival prediction performance by utilizing either the complementary or consensus information among multi-omics data. The proposed ConcatAE and CrossAE models can inspire future deep representation-based multi-omics integration techniques. We believe these novel multi-omics integration models can benefit the personalized diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.