Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933515›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Deep learning based feature-level integration of multi-omics data for breast cancer patients survival analysis.

Li Tong, Jonathan Mitchel, Kevin Chatlin, May D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. An Interpretable Omics-to-Image Transformer Framework for Cancer Prognosis Prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li TongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1556-1241
Jonathan MitchelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, 30332, USA.
Kevin ChatlinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, 30332, USA.
May D WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, 30332, USA. maywang@gatech.edu.

Funding

Contrast-Enhanced and Image-Guided Surgery of Lung CancerR01CA163256 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JO, HANJOONG, SINGHAL, SUNIL · 2011 to 2015
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most prevalent and among the most deadly cancers in females. Patients with breast cancer have highly variable survival lengths, indicating a need to identify prognostic biomarkers for personalized diagnosis and treatment. With the development of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing, multi-omics information are becoming available for a more thorough evaluation of a patient's condition. In this study, we aim to improve breast cancer overall survival prediction by integrating multi-omics data (e.g., gene expression, DNA methylation, miRNA expression, and copy number variations (CNVs)).

methodsMotivated by multi-view learning, we propose a novel strategy to integrate multi-omics data for breast cancer survival prediction by applying complementary and consensus principles. The complementary principle assumes each -omics data contains modality-unique information. To preserve such information, we develop a concatenation autoencoder (ConcatAE) that concatenates the hidden features learned from each modality for integration. The consensus principle assumes that the disagreements among modalities upper bound the model errors. To get rid of the noises or discrepancies among modalities, we develop a cross-modality autoencoder (CrossAE) to maximize the agreement among modalities to achieve a modality-invariant representation. We first validate the effectiveness of our proposed models on the MNIST simulated data. We then apply these models to the TCCA breast cancer multi-omics data for overall survival prediction.

resultsFor breast cancer overall survival prediction, the integration of DNA methylation and miRNA expression achieves the best overall performance of 0.641 ± 0.031 with ConcatAE, and 0.63 ± 0.081 with CrossAE. Both strategies outperform baseline single-modality models using only DNA methylation (0.583 ± 0.058) or miRNA expression (0.616 ± 0.057).

conclusionsIn conclusion, we achieve improved overall survival prediction performance by utilizing either the complementary or consensus information among multi-omics data. The proposed ConcatAE and CrossAE models can inspire future deep representation-based multi-omics integration techniques. We believe these novel multi-omics integration models can benefit the personalized diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMicroRNAsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenomicsHumansSurvival AnalysisMicroRNAsBreast CancerDeep learningMulti-omics integrationSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32933515
PMCPMC7493161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.