Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933505›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Can we predict early 7-day readmissions using a standard 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction model?

Sameh N Saleh, Anil N Makam, Ethan A Halm, Oanh Kieu Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effect of Nurse Staffing on Patient Outcomes in Acute Care Hospitals in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Trends in Readmission Prediction: An Overview of Approaches.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sameh N SalehDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA. sameh.n.saleh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-1659
Anil N MakamDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Ethan A HalmDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Oanh Kieu NguyenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)R24HS022418 · AHRQ · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALM, ETHAN A · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
Post-Acute Care in the Elderly: the Role of Long-Term Acute Care HospitalsK23AG052603 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKAM, ANIL NAGA · 2016 to 2021
$1.1M
Addressing Social Vulnerabilities to Prevent Hospital Readmissions in Adults with Cardiovascular DiseaseK23HL133441 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NGUYEN, OANH KIEU · 2017 to 2021
$932k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022418NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133441NIA NIH HHS K23 AG052603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite focus on preventing 30-day readmissions, early readmissions (within 7 days of discharge) may be more preventable than later readmissions (8-30 days). We assessed how well a previously validated 30-day EHR-based readmission prediction model predicts 7-day readmissions and compared differences in strength of predictors.

methodsWe conducted an observational study on adult hospitalizations from 6 diverse hospitals in North Texas using a 50-50 split-sample derivation and validation approach. We re-derived model coefficients for the same predictors as in the original 30-day model to optimize prediction of 7-day readmissions. We then compared the discrimination and calibration of the 7-day model to the 30-day model to assess model performance. To examine the changes in the point estimates between the two models, we evaluated the percent changes in coefficients.

resultsOf 32,922 index hospitalizations among unique patients, 4.4% had a 7-day admission and 12.7% had a 30-day readmission. Our original 30-day model had modestly lower discrimination for predicting 7-day vs. any 30-day readmission (C-statistic of 0.66 vs. 0.69, p ≤ 0.001). Our re-derived 7-day model had similar discrimination (C-statistic of 0.66, p = 0.38), but improved calibration. For the re-derived 7-day model, discharge day factors were more predictive of early readmissions, while baseline characteristics were less predictive.

conclusionA previously validated 30-day readmission model can also be used as a stopgap to predict 7-day readmissions as model performance did not substantially change. However, strength of predictors differed between the 7-day and 30-day model; characteristics at discharge were more predictive of 7-day readmissions, while baseline characteristics were less predictive. Improvements in predicting early 7-day readmissions will likely require new risk factors proximal to day of discharge.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient ReadmissionAgedFemaleForecastingHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference StandardsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTexasUnited StatesCare transitionsClinical decision supportEarly readmissionsHealthcare quality improvementHospital medicineHospital utilizationPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID32933505
PMCPMC7493907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.