Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933500›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

An app for supporting older people receiving home care - usage, aspects of health and health literacy: a quasi-experimental study.

Carina Göransson, Yvonne Wengström, Maria Hälleberg-Nyman, Ann Langius-Eklöf, Kristina Ziegert, Karin Blomberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carina GöranssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden. carina.goransson@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6215-2032
Yvonne WengströmTheme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria Hälleberg-NymanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Ann Langius-EklöfDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska, Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina ZiegertSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, 302 18, Halmstad, Sweden.
Karin BlombergFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEHalmstad University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 521-2014-2723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last decade, there has been an increase in studies describing use of mHealth, using smartphones with apps, in the healthcare system by a variety of populations. Despite this, few interventions including apps are targeting older people receiving home care. Developing mobile technology to its full potential of being interactive in real time remains a challenge. The current study is part of a larger project for identifying and managing health concerns via an app by using real-time data. The aim of the study was to describe older people's usage of an app and to evaluate the impact of usage on aspects of health and health literacy over time.

methodsA quasi-experimental design was employed. Seventeen older people self-reported health concerns via Interaktor twice a week for 3-months and answered questionnaires at baseline, the end of the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up. Logged data on app usage and data on Sense of Coherence, Health Index, Nutrition Form for the Elderly, Geriatric Depression Scale-20, Swedish Communicative and Critical Health Literacy and Swedish Functional Health Literacy were collected and analysed using descriptive and non-parametric inferential statistics.

resultsThe median usage of the app as intended was 96%. Pain was one of the most reported health concerns and was also the health concern that triggered an alert (n = 33). The older people's communicative and critical health literacy improved significantly over time. Regarding the scores of Sense of Coherence, Health Index, Nutritional Form for the Elderly, Geriatric Depression Scale-20 and Swedish Functional Health Literacy scale, there were no significant differences over time.

conclusionsThe high app usage showed that an app may be a suitable tool for some older people living alone and receiving home care. The results indicate that the usage of Interaktor can support older people by significantly improving their communicative and critical health literacy. Aspects of health were not shown to be affected by the usage of the app. Further research with larger sample is needed for evaluation the effect on health literacy, and which aspects of health of importance to support by an app.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHome Care ServicesMobile ApplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansSmartphoneSwedenAlertAppHealthHealth concernsHome caremHealthOlder peopleSelf-reportUsage

Identifiers

PMID32933500
PMCPMC7493150
OpenAlexW3086686824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.