Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933449›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Does conspicuousness scale linearly with colour distance? A test using reef fish.

Carl Santiago, Naomi F Green, Nadia Hamilton, John A Endler, Daniel C Osorio, N Justin Marshall, Karen L Cheney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cryptic Ontogenetic Changes in the Ventral Coloration of a Color Polymorphic Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis).Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of colour patterns for the recognition of flowers by bees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carl SantiagoSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Naomi F GreenSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Nadia HamiltonQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
John A EndlerCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Daniel C OsorioSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
N Justin MarshallQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Karen L CheneySchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To be effective, animal colour signals must attract attention-and therefore need to be conspicuous. To understand the signal function, it is useful to evaluate their conspicuousness to relevant viewers under various environmental conditions, including when visual scenes are cluttered by objects of varying colour. A widely used metric of colour difference (Δ

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal ScalesColor PerceptionCoral ReefsFishesPigmentationTetraodontiformescolour measurementcolour vision assessmentreceptor noise limited modelspectrophotometryvisual ecology

Identifiers

PMID32933449
PMCPMC7542806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.