Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933447›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Feeding specialization and longer generation time are associated with relatively larger brains in bees.

Ferran Sayol, Miguel Á Collado, Joan Garcia-Porta, Marc A Seid, Jason Gibbs, Ainhoa Agorreta, Diego San Mauro, Ivo Raemakers, Daniel Sol, Ignasi Bartomeus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of neurometabolic frugality in harvester ants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral performance and division of labor influence brain mosaicism in the leafcutter ant Atta cephalotes.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Brain size predicts learning abilities in bees.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive tasks could be biased towards generalists: a lesson from wild non-eusocial bees.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ferran SayolDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Miguel Á ColladoEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Joan Garcia-PortaDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Marc A SeidBiology Department, Neuroscience Program, The University of Scranton, Scranton, PA, USA.
Jason GibbsDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Ainhoa AgorretaDepartment of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Diego San MauroDepartment of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Ivo RaemakersVan Caldenborghstraat 26, 6247CG, The Netherlands.
Daniel SolCREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.
Ignasi BartomeusEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Estación Biológica de Doñana · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Scranton · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their miniature brains, insects exhibit substantial variation in brain size. Although the functional significance of this variation is increasingly recognized, research on whether differences in insect brain sizes are mainly the result of constraints or selective pressures has hardly been performed. Here, we address this gap by combining prospective and retrospective phylogenetic-based analyses of brain size for a major insect group, bees (superfamily Apoidea). Using a brain dataset of 93 species from North America and Europe, we found that body size was the single best predictor of brain size in bees. However, the analyses also revealed that substantial variation in brain size remained even when adjusting for body size. We consequently asked whether such variation in relative brain size might be explained by adaptive hypotheses. We found that ecologically specialized species with single generations have larger brains-relative to their body size-than generalist or multi-generation species, but we did not find an effect of sociality on relative brain size. Phylogenetic reconstruction further supported the existence of different adaptive optima for relative brain size in lineages differing in feeding specialization and reproductive strategy. Our findings shed new light on the evolution of the insect brain, highlighting the importance of ecological pressures over social factors and suggesting that these pressures are different from those previously found to influence brain evolution in other taxa.

Indexed as

BeesBrainFeeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsBiological EvolutionApoideabrain evolutionlecticityvoltinism

Identifiers

PMID32933447
PMCPMC7542820
OpenAlexW3086208827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.