Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933365›Full record

ReviewXenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems2021

Optimization of hydroxychloroquine dosing scheme based on COVID-19 patients' characteristics: a review of the literature and simulations.

Eleni Karatza, George Ismailos, Markos Marangos, Vangelis Karalis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Colchicine for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: efficacy, safety, and model informed dosage regimens.Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimization in the Context of COVID-19 Prediction and Control: A Literature Review.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleni KaratzaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-4121
George IsmailosExperimental-Research Center ELPEN, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, Pikermi, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-4978
Markos MarangosDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-2398
Vangelis KaralisDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-0712
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRElpen Pharmaceutical (Greece) · GRGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the recent COVID-19 outbreak hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been proposed as a safe and effective therapeutic option. However, a wide variety of dosing schemes has been applied in the clinical practice and tested in clinical studies. An extended literature survey was performed investigating the pharmacokinetics, the efficacy and safety of HCQ in COVID-19 treatment. Population pharmacokinetic models were retrieved from the literature and after evaluation and assessment one was selected in order to perform simulations. The most commonly applied dosing schemes were explored for patients with different weights and different levels of HCQ clearance impairment. Model-based simulations of HCQ concentrations revealed that high initial doses followed by low and sparse doses may offer significant benefits to patients by decreasing the viral load without reaching levels considered to produce adverse effects. For instance, the dosing scheme proposed for a 70 kg adult with moderate COVID-19 symptoms would be 600 mg upon diagnosis, 400 mg after 12 h, 300 mg after 24 h, 200 mg after 36 h, followed by 200 mg BID for 4 d, followed by 200 mg OD for 5 d. Based on the results from simulations performed and the currently published knowledge regarding HCQ in COVID-19 treatment, this study provides evidence that a high loading dose followed by sparse doses could offer significant benefits to the patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsComputer SimulationHumansHydroxychloroquineAntiviral AgentsHydroxychloroquineCOVID-19efficacy and safetyhydroxychloroquinemodeling and simulationprecision dosing

Identifiers

PMID32933365
PMCPMC7544961
OpenAlexW3086513704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.