ReviewCancers2020
Cellular Mechanisms Accounting for the Refractoriness of Colorectal Carcinoma to Pharmacological Treatment.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Clinical Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review (2020-2025).Oncology research · 2026Pooled it
- METTL3-YTHDF1-driven mMolecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Paired tumor-normal metabolomic profiling reveals alterations in choline phospholipid precursor metabolism in biliary tract cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- TBKBP1 induces capecitabine resistance through negative regulation of type I interferon pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.Oncogene · 2026Article
- Synergistic Interactions of Anthraquinones with Conventional Cancer Therapies.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Review
- Precemtabart tocentecan, an anti-CEACAM5 antibody-drug conjugate, in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Wnt5a suppresses colorectal cancer progression via TGF-β/NOTUM/OLFM4 axis in patient-derived organoids.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Real-World Evidence of Bevacizumab and Panitumumab Drug Resistance and Drug Ineffectiveness from EudraVigilance Database.Cancers · 2025Article
- STAT3 and the STAT3‑regulated inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin as potential therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer (Review).Biomedical reports · 2024Review
- The link between relative stability constant of DNA- and BSA-chromenopyrimidine complexes and cytotoxicity towards human breast cancer cells (MCF-7).RSC advances · 2023Article
- Article
- Research progress of traditional Chinese medicine as sensitizer in reversing chemoresistance of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- ATP Mimetic Attack on the Nucleotide-Binding Domain to Overcome ABC Transporter Mediated Chemoresistance.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2022Article
- Curcumin: A Novel Way to Improve Quality of Life for Colorectal Cancer Patients?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Mechanical signatures of human colon cancers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Expression of Chemoresistance-Associated ABC Proteins in Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Cancers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Review
- Visfatin inhibits colon cancer cell apoptosis and decreases chemosensitivity to 5‑FU by promoting the SDF‑1/CXCR4/Akt axis.International journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of autophagy related genes in predicting the prognosis and aiding 5- fluorouracil therapy of colorectal cancer.Heliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The unsatisfactory response of colorectal cancer (CRC) to pharmacological treatment contributes to the substantial global health burden caused by this disease. Over the last few decades, CRC has become the cause of more than 800,000 deaths per year. The reason is a combination of two factors: (i) the late cancer detection, which is being partially solved by the implementation of mass screening of adults over age 50, permitting earlier diagnosis and treatment; (ii) the inadequate response of advanced unresectable tumors (i.e., stages III and IV) to pharmacological therapy. The latter is due to the existence of complex mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOCs) that interact and synergize with each other, rendering CRC cells strongly refractory to the available pharmacological regimens based on conventional chemotherapy, such as pyrimidine analogs (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, trifluridine, and tipiracil), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, as well as drugs targeted toward tyrosine kinase receptors (regorafenib, aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, and ramucirumab), and, more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab). In the present review, we have inventoried the genes involved in the lack of CRC response to pharmacological treatment, classifying them into seven groups (from MOC-1 to MOC-7) according to functional criteria to identify cancer cell weaknesses. This classification will be useful to pave the way for developing sensitizing tools consisting of (i) new agents to be co-administered with the active drug; (ii) pharmacological approaches, such as drug encapsulation (e.g., into labeled liposomes or exosomes); (iii) gene therapy interventions aimed at restoring the impaired function of some proteins (e.g., uptake transporters and tumor suppressors) or abolishing that of others (such as export pumps and oncogenes).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.