Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933095›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Cellular Mechanisms Accounting for the Refractoriness of Colorectal Carcinoma to Pharmacological Treatment.

Jose J G Marin, Rocio I R Macias, Maria J Monte, Elisa Herraez, Ana Peleteiro-Vigil, Beatriz Sanchez de Blas, Paula Sanchon-Sanchez, Alvaro G Temprano, Ricardo A Espinosa-Escudero, Elisa Lozano and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. METTL3-YTHDF1-driven mMolecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Synergistic Interactions of Anthraquinones with Conventional Cancer Therapies.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose J G MarinExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1186-6849
Rocio I R MaciasExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-0326
Maria J MonteExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-7428
Elisa HerraezExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-3320
Ana Peleteiro-VigilExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5990-5037
Beatriz Sanchez de BlasExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-0106
Paula Sanchon-SanchezExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-8778
Alvaro G TempranoExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-5937
Ricardo A Espinosa-EscuderoExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Elisa LozanoExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Oscar BrizExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-1554
Marta R RomeroExperimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

PLANT MODELS FOR UV-INDUCED DEFENSE SYSTEMSF06TW002020 · FIC · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYS, JOHN B · 1994 to 1995
–
Centro Internacional sobre el Envejecimiento OLD-HEPAMARKER, 0348_CIE_6_EConsejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León SA063P17Fundació Marato TV3 201916-31Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer 2017/2020Instituto de Salud Carlos III EHD15PI05/2016Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00598; PI19/00819Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness SAF2016-75197-RUniversity of Salamanca 18.K137/463AC01; 18.K140/463AC01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unsatisfactory response of colorectal cancer (CRC) to pharmacological treatment contributes to the substantial global health burden caused by this disease. Over the last few decades, CRC has become the cause of more than 800,000 deaths per year. The reason is a combination of two factors: (i) the late cancer detection, which is being partially solved by the implementation of mass screening of adults over age 50, permitting earlier diagnosis and treatment; (ii) the inadequate response of advanced unresectable tumors (i.e., stages III and IV) to pharmacological therapy. The latter is due to the existence of complex mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOCs) that interact and synergize with each other, rendering CRC cells strongly refractory to the available pharmacological regimens based on conventional chemotherapy, such as pyrimidine analogs (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, trifluridine, and tipiracil), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, as well as drugs targeted toward tyrosine kinase receptors (regorafenib, aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, and ramucirumab), and, more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab). In the present review, we have inventoried the genes involved in the lack of CRC response to pharmacological treatment, classifying them into seven groups (from MOC-1 to MOC-7) according to functional criteria to identify cancer cell weaknesses. This classification will be useful to pave the way for developing sensitizing tools consisting of (i) new agents to be co-administered with the active drug; (ii) pharmacological approaches, such as drug encapsulation (e.g., into labeled liposomes or exosomes); (iii) gene therapy interventions aimed at restoring the impaired function of some proteins (e.g., uptake transporters and tumor suppressors) or abolishing that of others (such as export pumps and oncogenes).

Indexed as

apoptosiscancer stem cellcolon cancerDNA repairdrug transportepithelial–mesenchymal transitiongenetic variantsmetabolismmultidrug resistancetumor environment

Identifiers

PMID32933095
PMCPMC7563523
OpenAlexW3084873489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.