Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933061›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

The Effect of Transitioning between Feeding Methods on the Gut Microbiota Dynamics of Yaks on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Xiao-Ling Zhang, Tian-Wei Xu, Xun-Gang Wang, Yuan-Yue Geng, Hong-Jin Liu, Lin-Yong Hu, Na Zhao, Sheng-Ping Kang, Wan-Min Zhang, Shi-Xiao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Main Factors Influencing the Gut Microbiota of Datong Yaks in Mixed Group.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiao-Ling ZhangNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Tian-Wei XuNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Xun-Gang WangNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Yuan-Yue GengNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Hong-Jin LiuNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Lin-Yong HuNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Na ZhaoNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Sheng-Ping KangNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
Wan-Min ZhangHaibei Demonstration Zone of Plateau Modern Ecological Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, Haibei 812200, China.
Shi-Xiao XuNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.

Funding

"Key Technology Support Program" of Qinghai Province 2019-SF-149,2017-NK-153National Key R&D Plan 2018YFD0502301, 2016YFC0501905"Strategic Leading Science & Technology Program" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA23060603 XDA2005010406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we aimed to explore the change in yak gut microbiota after transferring yaks from grazing grassland to a feedlot, and determine their diet adaptation period. Five yaks were transferred from winter pasture to an indoor feedlot. Fecal samples were obtained from grazing (G) and feedlot feeding yaks at day 1 (D1), day 4 (D4), day 7 (D7), day 11 (D11), and day 16 (D16). The dynamic variation of the bacterial community was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The results showed that the yak gut microbial community structure underwent significant changes after diet transition. At the phylum and genus levels, most bacteria changed within D1-D11; however, no significant changes were observed from D11-D16. Furthermore, we used random forest to determine the key bacteria (at class level) disturbing gut micro-ecology. The relative abundance of the top four classes (

Indexed as

adaptation timedynamic variationgut microbiotaQinghai–Tibet Plateauyak

Identifiers

PMID32933061
PMCPMC7552143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.