Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32933035›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2020

Investigating Commercial Filaments for 3D Printing of Stiff and Elastic Constructs with Ligament-Like Mechanics.

Audrey A Pitaru, Jean-Gabriel Lacombe, Megan E Cooke, Lorne Beckman, Thomas Steffen, Michael H Weber, Paul A Martineau, Derek H Rosenzweig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polymeric Microfluidic Fuel Cells with Controlled Printed Patterns.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey A PitaruDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-6981
Jean-Gabriel LacombeDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6212-9473
Megan E CookeDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-7559
Lorne BeckmanThe Orthopaedics Research Lab, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
Thomas SteffenThe Orthopaedics Research Lab, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
Michael H WeberDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
Paul A MartineauDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.
Derek H RosenzweigDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-8177
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current gold standard technique for treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is reconstruction with autograft. These treatments have a relatively high failure and re-tear rate. To overcome this, tissue engineering and additive manufacturing are being used to explore the potential of 3D scaffolds as autograft substitutes. However, mechanically optimal polymers for this have yet to be identified. Here, we use 3D printing technology and various materials with the aim of fabricating constructs better matching the mechanical properties of the native ACL. A fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer was used to microfabricate dog bone-shaped specimens from six different polymers-PLA, PETG, Lay FOMM 60, NinjaFlex, NinjaFlex-SemiFlex, and FlexiFil-at three different raster angles. The tensile mechanical properties of these polymers were determined from stress-strain curves. Our results indicate that no single material came close enough to successfully match reported mechanical properties of the native ACL. However, PLA and PETG had similar ultimate tensile strengths. Lay FOMM 60 displayed a percentage strain at failure similar to reported values for native ACL. Furthermore, raster angle had a significant impact on some mechanical properties for all of the materials except for FlexiFil. We therefore conclude that while none of these materials alone is optimal for mimicking ACL mechanical properties, there may be potential for creating a 3D-printed composite constructs to match ACL mechanical properties. Further investigations involving co-printing of stiff and elastomeric materials must be explored.

Indexed as

3D printingelasticligamentmechanical strainpolymersscaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32933035
PMCPMC7570386
OpenAlexW3086561666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.