Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932896›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Assessing Infection Risks among Clients and Staff Who Use Tattooing Services in Poland: An Observational Study.

Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska, Izabela Kucharska, Agnieszka Segiet-Swiecicka, Marcin Kuczerowski, Robert Gajda

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anita Gębska-KuczerowskaCollegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Kazimierza Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9268-3731
Izabela KucharskaChief Sanitary Inspectorate, Targowa 65, 03-729 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka Segiet-SwiecickaFaculty and Department of Experimental Physiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin KuczerowskiHospital Praski, Aleja Solidarności 67, 03-401 Warsaw, Poland.
Robert GajdaGajda-Med Medical Center, ul. Piotra Skargi 23/29, 06-100 Pułtusk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8305-8130
Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLNarodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across cultures and generations, people have tattooed their bodies. Although blood-borne infections from tattooing have been reduced, certain service aspects remain improperly managed. We assessed the infection risks associated with tattooing by conducting a cross-sectional study (2013-2014) in Poland using an anonymous questionnaire survey. Scoring procedures for blood-borne infection risks for tattooists and their clients were used. Overall, 255 tattooists were interviewed. A quasi-random selection of tattoo parlors was based on a service register. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding blood-borne infection risks were assessed using a questionnaire. Simultaneously, tattoo centers were audited. Tattooing had a higher infection risk for tattooists than for clients. Approximately 50% of respondents underwent training on postexposure procedures, which constituted almost one in five of the reported needlestick/cut injuries sustained while working. Furthermore, 25.8% had no knowledge regarding risk from reliable sources, and 2.1% had not broadened their knowledge. Tattooists and their clients are at a risk of infection, and knowledge concerning infection risks remains an underestimated preventative factor. Service quality surveillance and creation of a register for tattoo-related complications may help assess the scale of this public health issue. However, a lack of these records implies the challenges in developing effective organizational and legal protections.

Indexed as

Needlestick InjuriesTattooingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPolandRiskSurveys and Questionnairesblood-borne infectioninfection riskneedlestick injuryPolandtattoo

Identifiers

PMID32932896
PMCPMC7559388
OpenAlexW3084985513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.