Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932873›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Enhanced Agronomic Efficiency Using a New Controlled-Released, Polymeric-Coated Nitrogen Fertilizer in Rice.

Ricardo Gil-Ortiz, Miguel Ángel Naranjo, Antonio Ruiz-Navarro, Sergio Atares, Carlos García, Lincoln Zotarelli, Alberto San Bautista, Oscar Vicente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Slow-Release Urea on Yield and Quality ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Gil-OrtizInstitute for Plant Molecular and Cell Biology (UPV-CSIC), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-2140
Miguel Ángel NaranjoInstitute for Plant Molecular and Cell Biology (UPV-CSIC), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Ruiz-NavarroCentre for Soil and Applied Biology Science of Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo University Campus, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1948-8432
Sergio AtaresFertinagro Biotech S.L., Polígono de la Paz, C/ Berlín s/n, 44195 Teruel, Spain.
Carlos GarcíaCentre for Soil and Applied Biology Science of Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo University Campus, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Lincoln ZotarelliHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Alberto San BautistaPlant Production Department, School of Agricultural Engineering and Environment, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Oscar VicenteInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Valencian Agrodiversity (COMAV), Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5076-3784
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESCentro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura · ESUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RTC-2014-1457-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertilizer-use efficiency is one of the most critical concerns in rice cultivation to reduce N losses, increase yields, and improve crop management. The effects of a new polymeric-coated controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) were compared to those of other slow-release and traditional fertilizers in a microscale experiment, which was carried out in cuvettes under partly controlled ambient conditions, and a large-scale field experiment. To evaluate the fertilizer's efficiency, nitrogen and water-use efficiency were calculated using the measurement of different photosynthetic and crop yield parameters. Improved responses regarding some of the analyzed physiological and growth parameters were observed for those plants fertilized with the new CRF. In the microscale experiment, significantly increased yields (ca. 35%) were produced in the plants treated with CRF as compared to traditional fertilizer. These results were in accordance with ca. 24% significant increased levels of N in leaves of CRF-treated plants, besides increased P, Fe, Mn, and cytokinin contents. At the field scale, similar yields were obtained with the slow-release or traditional fertilizers and CRF at a 20% reduced N dose. The new controlled-release fertilizer is a urea-based fertilizer coated with lignosulfonates, which is cheaply produced from the waste of pulp and wood industries, containing humic acids as biostimulants. In conclusion, CRF is recommended to facilitate rice crop management and to reduce contamination, as it can be formulated with lower N doses and because it is ecological manufacturing.

Indexed as

controlled-release fertilizerhumic acidlignosulfonatenatural polymersOryza sativa

Identifiers

PMID32932873
PMCPMC7569961
OpenAlexW3085674801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.