Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932867›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Adult Neurogenesis in the

Guiyi Li, Alicia Hidalgo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Repair Manual of a Fruit Fly Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell cycle re-entry in the agingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guiyi LiSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Alicia HidalgoSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8041-5764
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R017034/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing the existence and extent of neurogenesis in the adult brain throughout the animals including humans, would transform our understanding of how the brain works, and how to tackle brain damage and disease. Obtaining convincing, indisputable experimental evidence has generally been challenging. Here, we revise the state of this question in the fruit-fly

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell ProliferationDrosophilaHumansNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsadultbrainBrdUcell proliferationdeadpandMycDrosophilaEdUeigerFUCCIgliogenesishomeostasisinjuryinscutableMARCMmiR-31aMyD88neural stem cellneuroblastneurogenesisPCNAplasticityprogenitorstgTNFToll-2wekYki

Identifiers

PMID32932867
PMCPMC7554932
OpenAlexW3086607225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.