ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Research Ethics with Gender and Sexually Diverse Persons.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Personalization variables in digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in adolescents and youth: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- The concept of intersectionality in bioethics: a systematic review.BMC medical ethics · 2024Pooled it
- Advancing Inclusive Design Practice for Queer Youth Using Digital Technologies for Mental Health.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- An Exploration of the Views and Perspectives of Australian Trans and Gender Diverse Individuals About Transvaginal Ultrasound.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- Recommendations for the inclusion and study of sex and gender in research.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Reducing Disparities and Improving Mental Health for Transgender Persons.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- How Many Sexes, How Many Genders? And What Does This Imply for (Social) Scientists?Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Cass Review does not guide care for trans young people.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Female Speaker Representation at the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Annual Meetings Over Time.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Epistemic appropriation and the ethics of engaging with trans community knowledge in the context of mental healthcare research.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2024Article
- The 2024International journal of exercise science · 2024Article
- Exploring Aromanticism Through an Online Qualitative Investigation With the Aromantic Community: "Freeing, Alienating, and Utterly Fantastic".International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient priorities for fulfilling the principle of respect in research: findings from a modified Delphi study.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Engaging community members to ensure culturally specific language is used in research: should I use gay, queer, MSM, or this other new acronym?Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Impact of puberty, sex determinants and chronic inflammation on cardiovascular risk in young people.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Assessing Sex, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Mental Health Concerns in Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment Research: Measurement Challenges and Recommendations From a Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Pre-conference Workshop.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying and developing inclusive policy and practice responses to health and social inequities in gender and sexually diverse persons require inclusive research ethics and methods in order to develop sound data. This article articulates 12 ethical principles for researchers undertaking gender and sexually diverse social, health, and related research. We have called these the 'Montréal Ethical Principles for Inclusive Research.' While writing from an international social work perspective, our aim is to promote ethical research that benefits people being researched by all disciplines. This paper targets four groups of interest: 1. Cisgender and heterosexual researchers; 2. Researchers who research 'general' populations; 3. and sexually diverse researchers; 4. Human ethics committees. This article was stimulated by the 2018 Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles, which positions human dignity at its core. It is critically important to understand and account for the intersectionality of gender and sexuality with discourses of race, ethnicity, colonialism, dis/ability, age, etc. Taking this intersectionality into consideration, this article draws on scholarship that underpins ethical principles developed for other minoritized communities, to ensure that research addresses the autonomy of these participants at every stage. Research that positions inclusive research ethics at its foundation can provide a solid basis for policy and practice responses to health and social inequities in gender and sexually diverse persons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.