ArticleBrain sciences2020
Response to Placebo in Fragile X Syndrome Clinical Trials: An Initial Analysis.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results from a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose, Crossover Trial of Lovastatin or Minocycline in Fragile X Syndrome.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2025Trial
- Effects of AFQ056 on language learning in fragile X syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Trial
- Clinical Trial Designs for Rare Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Interventions in Fragile X Syndrome.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Review
- Outcome strategies for clinical trials in Neuropaediatric rare diseases.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
- Microbiome modulation and behavioural improvements in children with fragile X syndrome following probiotic intake: A pilot study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of the Angelman syndrome video assessment: quantifying meaningful change.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Validating brain activity measures as reliable indicators of individual diagnostic group and genetically mediated sub-group membership Fragile X Syndrome.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Validating brain activity measures as reliable indicators of individual diagnostic group and genetically mediated sub-group membership Fragile X Syndrome.Research square · 2024Article
- "Corp-Osa-Mente", a Combined Psychosocial-Neuropsychological Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults with Fragile X Syndrome: An Explorative Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Targeted Treatments for Fragile X Syndrome.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Fragile X Syndrome: Recent Research Updates toward Capturing Treatments' Improvement in Clinical Trials.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Large multicenter randomized trials in autism: key insights gained from the balovaptan clinical development program.Molecular autism · 2022Article
- Identification of microRNAs associated with human fragile X syndrome using next-generation sequencing.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Randomised controlled trials of mood stabilisers for people with autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.BJPsych open · 2022Review
- Fragile X Syndrome: From Molecular Aspect to Clinical Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- EEG as a translational biomarker and outcome measure in fragile X syndrome.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
- Article
- Gaboxadol in Fragile X Syndrome: A 12-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 2a Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity in Fragile X Syndrome Highlights the Need for Precision Medicine-Based Treatments.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading cause of inherited intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Individuals with FXS often present with a wide range of cognitive deficits and problem behaviors. Educational, behavioral and pharmacological interventions are used to manage these and other complex issues affecting individuals with FXS. Despite the success of preclinical models and early-phase drug clinical studies in FXS, large-scale randomized-controlled trials have failed to meet primary endpoints. Currently, no targeted or disease-modifying treatments for FXS have received regulatory approval. Here, we examined the placebo response in FXS clinical trials conducted between 2006 and 2018. Specifically, we performed a meta-analysis of placebo-treated groups in eight double-blind, randomized controlled trials. Placebo groups demonstrated significant improvements on caregiver-rated efficacy endpoints, which were greater in adolescents and adults than in children. Among the latter measures, the Visual Analog Scale scores displayed the greatest improvements, whereas the positive effects on the Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Composite and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community/fragile X version were statistically significant in both children and adolescents/adults. Although the Clinical Global Impression scale Improvement appears to have exhibited a substantial placebo effect in multiple clinical trials in FXS, limited data availability for meta-analysis, prevented us from drawing conclusions. No placebo-related improvements were observed in performance-rated measures. These findings raise substantial concerns about placebo effects in outcome measures commonly used in the randomized-controlled trials in FXS and suggest several potential improvements in the study design and implementation of such trials. Considering the small number of trials available for this study, larger and more detailed follow up meta-analyses are needed. Meanwhile, efforts to improve the measurement properties of endpoints and rater training in drug trials in FXS should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.