Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932789›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Response to Placebo in Fragile X Syndrome Clinical Trials: An Initial Analysis.

Skylar Luu, Haley Province, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Randi Hagerman, David Hessl, Dhananjay Vaidya, Reymundo Lozano, Hilary Rosselot, Craig Erickson, Walter E Kaufmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of AFQ056 on language learning in fragile X syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeted Treatments for Fragile X Syndrome.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Fragile X Syndrome: From Molecular Aspect to Clinical Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Skylar LuuAlbany Medical Center, Albany Medical College, 43 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-0027
Haley ProvinceFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 420 E. Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Elizabeth Berry-KravisDepartments of Pediatrics, Neurological Sciences, Biochemistry, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison, Suite 718, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Randi HagermanMIND Institute and the Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2825 50th Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-8448
David HesslMIND Institute and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2825 50th Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Dhananjay VaidyaDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Reymundo LozanoDepartments of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Hilary RosselotNational Fragile X Foundation, McLean, VA 22102, USA.
Craig EricksonDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4002, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Walter E KaufmannBoston Children's Hospital and Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Dejan B BudimirovicKennedy Krieger Institute/The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences-Child Psychiatry, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1741 Ashland Ave, Rm 241, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7263-5134
University of California Davis Medical Center · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USNational Fragile X Foundation · USNorthwestern University · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading cause of inherited intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Individuals with FXS often present with a wide range of cognitive deficits and problem behaviors. Educational, behavioral and pharmacological interventions are used to manage these and other complex issues affecting individuals with FXS. Despite the success of preclinical models and early-phase drug clinical studies in FXS, large-scale randomized-controlled trials have failed to meet primary endpoints. Currently, no targeted or disease-modifying treatments for FXS have received regulatory approval. Here, we examined the placebo response in FXS clinical trials conducted between 2006 and 2018. Specifically, we performed a meta-analysis of placebo-treated groups in eight double-blind, randomized controlled trials. Placebo groups demonstrated significant improvements on caregiver-rated efficacy endpoints, which were greater in adolescents and adults than in children. Among the latter measures, the Visual Analog Scale scores displayed the greatest improvements, whereas the positive effects on the Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Composite and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community/fragile X version were statistically significant in both children and adolescents/adults. Although the Clinical Global Impression scale Improvement appears to have exhibited a substantial placebo effect in multiple clinical trials in FXS, limited data availability for meta-analysis, prevented us from drawing conclusions. No placebo-related improvements were observed in performance-rated measures. These findings raise substantial concerns about placebo effects in outcome measures commonly used in the randomized-controlled trials in FXS and suggest several potential improvements in the study design and implementation of such trials. Considering the small number of trials available for this study, larger and more detailed follow up meta-analyses are needed. Meanwhile, efforts to improve the measurement properties of endpoints and rater training in drug trials in FXS should be prioritized.

Indexed as

clinical trials placebo effectfragile X syndromemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32932789
PMCPMC7563217
OpenAlexW3086458492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.