Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932731›Full record

ArticleMembranes2020

Is the Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Feasible for Osteopromotive Property?

Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli, Leticia Freitas de Mendes Brasil, Járede Carvalho Pereira, Hesham Mohammed Al-Sharani, Gustavo Antonio Correa Momesso, Leonardo P Faverani, Flavia de Almeida Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The applications of polysaccharides in dentistry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Paula Farnezi BassiDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0031-4953
Vinícius Ferreira BizelliDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Leticia Freitas de Mendes BrasilDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Járede Carvalho PereiraDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Hesham Mohammed Al-SharaniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb 16015-050, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-2408
Gustavo Antonio Correa MomessoDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Leonardo P FaveraniDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-3048
Flavia de Almeida LucasDepartment of Animal Clinic, Surgery and Reproduction, São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16050-698, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-8528

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/23790-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration was studied to establish protocols and develop new biomaterials that revealed satisfactory results. The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the efficiency of the bacterial cellulose membrane (Nanoskin

Indexed as

biomaterialscellulosexenografts

Identifiers

PMID32932731
PMCPMC7558580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.