Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32932427›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2021

The influence of social determinants of health on the genetic diagnostic odyssey: who remains undiagnosed, why, and to what effect?

Yarden S Fraiman, Monica H Wojcik

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An integrated cardiometabolic genetic testing program in a predominantly Hispanic population within a community setting.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nursing's Role in Advancing Care for Rare Genetic Diseases.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  16. From Doubt to Diagnosis: Canadian Patient Perspectives on a Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Diagnosis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Estimating the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening for treatable inherited metabolic disorders.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yarden S FraimanDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica H WojcikDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. monica.wojcik@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-5031
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Training in Child Health Services Research and Implementation ScienceT32HS000063 · AHRQ · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI GARABEDIAN, LAURA FADEN, WALSH, KATHLEEN ELIZABETH · 1994 to 2024
$7.6M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Mendelian genetic disorders are individually rare, they are collectively more common and contribute disproportionately to pediatric morbidity and mortality. Remarkable advances in the past decade have led to identification of the precise genetic variants responsible for many of these conditions. Confirming the molecular diagnosis through genetic testing allows for individualized treatment plans in addition to ending the diagnostic odyssey, which not only halts further unnecessary testing but may also result in immense psychological benefit, leading to improved quality of life. However, ensuring equitable application of these advances in genomic technology has been challenging. Though prior studies have revealed disparities in testing for genetic predisposition to cancer in adults, little is known about the prevalence and nature of disparities in diagnostic testing in the pediatric rare disease population. While it seems logical that those with impaired access to healthcare would be less likely to receive the genetic testing needed to end their odyssey, few studies have addressed this question directly and the potential impact on health outcomes. This review synthesizes the available evidence regarding disparities in pediatric genetic diagnosis, defining the need for further, prospective studies with the ultimate goal of delivering precision medicine to all who stand to benefit. IMPACT: Social determinants of health are known to contribute to inequality in outcomes, though the impact on pediatric rare disease patients is not fully understood. Diagnostic genetic testing is a powerful tool, though it may not be available to all in need. This article represents the first effort, to our knowledge, to evaluate the existing literature regarding disparities in genetic testing for pediatric rare disease diagnosis and identify gaps in care.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenetic VariationHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Status DisparitiesSocial Determinants of HealthGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPredictive Value of TestsRace FactorsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32932427
PMCPMC7897209
OpenAlexW3087122444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.