Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32931941›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

(TS)

Liming Zhong, Tengfei Li, Hai Shu, Chao Huang, Jason Michael Johnson, Donald F Schomer, Ho-Ling Liu, Qianjin Feng, Wei Yang, Hongtu Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BiTr-Unet: a CNN-Transformer Combined Network for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation.Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop) · 2021
    Article
  6. A Two-Stage Cascade Model with Variational Autoencoders and Attention Gates for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation.Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop) · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liming ZhongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tengfei LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Hai ShuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, United States.
Chao HuangDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Jason Michael JohnsonDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Donald F SchomerDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Ho-Ling LiuDepartment of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Qianjin FengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongtu ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States. Electronic address: htzhu@email.unc.edu.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSouthern Medical University · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Imaging Data in Curved SpaceR01MH086633 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
Analysis of Big Data Squared in Biomedical StudiesR01MH116527 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086633NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumor is the most aggressive white matter (WM) invasive cerebral primary neoplasm. Due to its inherently heterogeneous appearance and shape, previous studies pursued either the segmentation precision of the tumors or qualitative analysis of the impact of brain tumors on WM integrity with manual delineation of tumors. This paper aims to develop a comprehensive analytical pipeline, called (TS)

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerWhite MatterDiffusion tensor imagingGlioblastomaTract statisticsTumor segmentationWhite matter integrity

Identifiers

PMID32931941
PMCPMC7688588
OpenAlexW3086354526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.