Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32931516›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

MONET: Multi-omic module discovery by omic selection.

Nimrod Rappoport, Roy Safra, Ron Shamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-modal learning with incomplete data.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. AI based multiomics integration for cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nimrod RappoportThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0951-6244
Roy SafraThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2322-1570
Ron ShamirThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1889-9870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in experimental biology allow creation of datasets where several genome-wide data types (called omics) are measured per sample. Integrative analysis of multi-omic datasets in general, and clustering of samples in such datasets specifically, can improve our understanding of biological processes and discover different disease subtypes. In this work we present MONET (Multi Omic clustering by Non-Exhaustive Types), which presents a unique approach to multi-omic clustering. MONET discovers modules of similar samples, such that each module is allowed to have a clustering structure for only a subset of the omics. This approach differs from most existent multi-omic clustering algorithms, which assume a common structure across all omics, and from several recent algorithms that model distinct cluster structures. We tested MONET extensively on simulated data, on an image dataset, and on ten multi-omic cancer datasets from TCGA. Our analysis shows that MONET compares favorably with other multi-omic clustering methods. We demonstrate MONET's biological and clinical relevance by analyzing its results for Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma. We also show that MONET is robust to missing data, can cluster genes in multi-omic dataset, and reveal modules of cell types in single-cell multi-omic data. Our work shows that MONET is a valuable tool that can provide complementary results to those provided by existent algorithms for multi-omic analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32931516
PMCPMC7518594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.