Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32931511›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Apparent prevalence and risk factors of coxiellosis (Q fever) among dairy herds in India.

Pankaj Dhaka, Satya Veer Singh Malik, Jay Prakash Yadav, Manesh Kumar, Sukhadeo B Barbuddhe, Deepak B Rawool

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy and Safety of an Inactivated Phase IAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endemicity ofHeliyon · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Q Fever: A troubling disease and a challenging diagnosis.Clinical microbiology newsletter · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pankaj DhakaDivision of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India.
Satya Veer Singh MalikDivision of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India.
Jay Prakash YadavDivision of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India.
Manesh KumarDivision of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India.
Sukhadeo B BarbuddheICAR-National Research Centre on Meat, Chengicherla, Hyderabad, India.
Deepak B RawoolDivision of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-4708
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INICAR - National Meat Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coxiella burnetii is a highly infectious zoonotic pathogen infecting wide range of mammals, including humans. In the present study, a total of 711 blood samples from bovines [cattle (n = 543) and buffaloes (n = 168)] from eight farms at different geographical locations in India were screened for C. burnetii targeting the IS1111 and the com1 genes. The anti-C. burnetii antibodies in serum samples were detected using indirect-ELISA kits. Also, a total of 21 parameters pertaining to animal health and farm management were identified to assess their role as possible risk factors for coxiellosis among the targeted farms. The apparent prevalence (positive for PCR and/or ELISA) for coxiellosis was reported to be 24.5% in cattle and 8.9% in buffaloes. In cattle, the detection rate of C. burnetii employing the IS1111 gene (8.5%) was found to be significantly higher (p<0.05) as compared to the com1 (6.5%) gene. The seropositivity by ELISA was higher among cattle (17.7%) than in buffaloes (8.3%). Further, on univariable analysis of risk factors, species (cattle) (OR:3.31; 95%CI:1.88-5.82), inadequate floor spacing (OR:1.64; 95%CI:1.10-2.43), mastitis (OR:2.35, 95%CI:1.45-3.81) and reproductive disorders (OR:2.54; 95%CI:1.67-3.85) were significantly (p<0.05) having high odds for coxiellosis. The multivariable logistic regression analysis of the animal level risk factors revealed that species and age were found to be significantly associated with coxiellosis. However, since the number of screened farms is limited; further research is needed with a higher number of animals to confirm the farm level odds ratio of risk factors. Quarantine and biosecurity measures including farm hygiene operations were observed to be inadequate and also the lack of awareness about coxiellosis among the farm workers. In absence of vaccination program for coxiellosis in India, robust surveillance, farm biosecurity measures and the awareness for the disease among risk groups can play an important role in the disease prevention and subsequent transmission of the pathogen.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCattleCattle DiseasesCoxiella burnetiiEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFarmersFemaleHumansIndiaMilkPolymerase Chain ReactionQ FeverZoonosesAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID32931511
PMCPMC7491716
OpenAlexW3087487741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.