Observational studyCritical care medicine2020
Evaluating Pediatric Sepsis Definitions Designed for Electronic Health Record Extraction and Multicenter Quality Improvement.
Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05311046 (Biomarker-enhanced Artificial Intelligence Based Pediatric Sepsis Screening Tool Towards Early Recognition and Personalized Therapeutics), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biomarker-enhanced Artificial Intelligence Based Pediatric Sepsis Screening Tool Towards Early Recognition and Personalized Therapeutics
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Alerts and Alarms-Can Electronic Medical Records Help Children and Adolescents Survive Sepsis?Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Application of New Pediatric Sepsis Definition to a Multicenter Observational Cohort of Previously Enrolled Severe Sepsis Patients Defined by SIRS Plus Organ Dysfunction.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2025Observational
- Unraveling the Easix Score: Its Association with Vasopressor Need in Critically Ill Septic Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Early clinical evaluation of a vendor developed pediatric artificial intelligence sepsis model in the emergency department.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Phoenix Sepsis Criteria in Critically Ill Children: Retrospective Validation Using a United States Nine-Center Dataset, 2012-2018.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025Article
- A scoping review on pediatric sepsis prediction technologies in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators to effective electronic health record-based sepsis screening in the pediatric intensive care unit.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Delays to Antibiotics in the Emergency Department and Risk of Mortality in Children With Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Pediatric Sepsis in General Emergency Departments: Association Between Pediatric Sepsis Case Volume, Care Quality, and Outcome.Annals of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the Phoenix Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock.JAMA · 2024Article
- A sepsis trigger tool reduces time to antibiotic administration in the NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- Implementing Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: Improving Compliance With Lactate Measurement in the PICU.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Article
- Identifying Potentially Unnecessary Hospitalizations in Children With Pneumonia.Hospital pediatrics · 2022Article
- Pediatric sepsis phenotypes for enhanced therapeutics: An application of clustering to electronic health records.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Using Aggregate Vasoactive-Inotrope Scores to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Metric Development for the Multicenter Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) Collaborative.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Development of a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative to Improve Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Labeling Sepsis: Many Square Pegs into Countless Round Roles.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the Children's Hospital Association's Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis definitions and the identified patients; evaluate the definition using a published framework for evaluating sepsis definitions.
designObservational cohort.
settingMulticenter quality improvement collaborative of 46 hospitals from January 2017 to December 2018, excluding neonatal ICUs. PATIENTS: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis was defined by electronic health record evidence of suspected infection and sepsis treatment or organ dysfunction. A more severely ill subgroup, Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis, was defined, approximating septic shock.
interventionsParticipating hospitals identified patients, extracted data, and transferred de-identified data to a central data warehouse. The definitions were evaluated across domains of reliability, content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, measurement burden, and timeliness. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsForty hospitals met data quality criteria across four electronic health record platforms. There were 23,976 cases of Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis, including 8,565 with Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The median age was 5.9 years. There were 10,316 (43.0%) immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients, 4,135 (20.3%) with central lines, and 2,352 (11.6%) chronically ventilated. Among Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis patients, 60.8% were admitted to intensive care, 26.4% had new positive-pressure ventilation, and 19.7% received vasopressors. Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days (3.0-13.0 d). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was 958 (4.0%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis; 541 (6.3%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated strengths in content validity, convergent construct validity, and criterion validity; weakness in reliability. Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions had significant initial measurement burden (median time from case completion to submission: 15 mo [interquartile range, 13-18 mo]); timeliness improved once data capture was established (median, 26 d; interquartile range, 23-56 d).
conclusionsThe Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated feasibility for large-scale data abstraction. The patients identified provide important information about children treated for sepsis. When operationalized, these definitions enabled multicenter identification and data aggregation, indicating practical utility for quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.