Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32931151›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2021

Development and Analytical Validation of a 29 Gene Clinical Pharmacogenetic Genotyping Panel: Multi-Ethnic Allele and Copy Number Variant Detection.

Stuart A Scott, Erick R Scott, Yoshinori Seki, Annette J Chen, Richard Wallsten, Aniwaa Owusu Obeng, Mariana R Botton, Neal Cody, Huanzhi Shi, Geping Zhao and 8 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Stuart A ScottSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-1864
Erick R ScottDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Yoshinori SekiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Annette J ChenSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Richard WallstenSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Aniwaa Owusu ObengDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Mariana R BottonSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Neal CodySema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Huanzhi ShiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Geping ZhaoSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Paul BrakeSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Paola NicolettiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Yao YangDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-8859
Maria DelioSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Lisong ShiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Ruth KornreichSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Eric E SchadtSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Lisa EdelmannSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a novel pharmacogenetic genotyping panel, a multidisciplinary team evaluated available evidence and selected 29 genes implicated in interindividual drug response variability, including 130 sequence variants and additional copy number variants (CNVs). Of the 29 genes, 11 had guidelines published by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Targeted genotyping and CNV interrogation were accomplished by multiplex single-base extension using the MassARRAY platform (Agena Biosciences) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MRC Holland), respectively. Analytical validation of the panel was accomplished by a strategic combination of > 500 independent tests performed on 170 unique reference material DNA samples, which included sequence variant and CNV accuracy, reproducibility, and specimen (blood, saliva, and buccal swab) controls. Among the accuracy controls were 32 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project that were selected based on their enrichment of sequence variants included in the pharmacogenetic panel (VarCover.org). Coupled with publicly available samples from the Genetic Testing Reference Materials Coordination Program (GeT-RM), accuracy validation material was available for the majority (77%) of interrogated sequence variants (100% with average allele frequencies > 0.1%), as well as additional structural alleles with unique copy number signatures (e.g., CYP2D6*5, *13, *36, *68; CYP2B6*29; and CYP2C19*36). Accuracy and reproducibility for both genotyping and copy number were > 99.9%, indicating that the optimized panel platforms were precise and robust. Importantly, multi-ethnic allele frequencies of the interrogated variants indicate that the vast majority of the general population carries at least one of these clinically relevant pharmacogenetic variants, supporting the implementation of this panel for pharmacogenetic research and/or clinical implementation programs.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6DNADNA Copy Number VariationsEthnicityGene FrequencyGenotyping TechniquesHumansMouth MucosaPharmacogenomic TestingPharmacogenomic VariantsReproducibility of ResultsSalivaCYP2B6 protein, humanCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6DNA

Identifiers

PMID32931151
PMCPMC7877843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.