Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32931110›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2020

The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management.

Mario Maj, Dan J Stein, Gordon Parker, Mark Zimmerman, Giovanni A Fava, Marc De Hert, Koen Demyttenaere, Roger S McIntyre, Thomas Widiger, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Is the antidepressant efficacy of ketamine and esketamine mediated via opioid mechanisms?European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Mario MajDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Dan J SteinSouth African Medical Research Council Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Gordon ParkerSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark ZimmermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Giovanni A FavaDepartment of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Marc De HertUniversity Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Koen DemyttenaereUniversity Psychiatric Centre, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Roger S McIntyreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Thomas WidigerDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Hans-Ulrich WittchenInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
KU Leuven · BELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERhode Island Hospital · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is widely acknowledged to be a heterogeneous entity, and the need to further characterize the individual patient who has received this diagnosis in order to personalize the management plan has been repeatedly emphasized. However, the research evidence that should guide this personalization is at present fragmentary, and the selection of treatment is usually based on the clinician's and/or the patient's preference and on safety issues, in a trial-and-error fashion, paying little attention to the particular features of the specific case. This may be one of the reasons why the majority of patients with a diagnosis of depression do not achieve remission with the first treatment they receive. The predominant pessimism about the actual feasibility of the personalization of treatment of depression in routine clinical practice has recently been tempered by some secondary analyses of databases from clinical trials, using approaches such as individual patient data meta-analysis and machine learning, which indicate that some variables may indeed contribute to the identification of patients who are likely to respond differently to various antidepressant drugs or to antidepressant medication vs. specific psychotherapies. The need to develop decision support tools guiding the personalization of treatment of depression has been recently reaffirmed, and the point made that these tools should be developed through large observational studies using a comprehensive battery of self-report and clinical measures. The present paper aims to describe systematically the salient domains that should be considered in this effort to personalize depression treatment. For each domain, the available research evidence is summarized, and the relevant assessment instruments are reviewed, with special attention to their suitability for use in routine clinical practice, also in view of their possible inclusion in the above-mentioned comprehensive battery of measures. The main unmet needs that research should address in this area are emphasized. Where the available evidence allows providing the clinician with specific advice that can already be used today to make the management of depression more personalized, this advice is highlighted. Indeed, some sections of the paper, such as those on neurocognition and on physical comorbidities, indicate that the modern management of depression is becoming increasingly complex, with several components other than simply the choice of an antidepressant and/or a psychotherapy, some of which can already be reliably personalized.

Indexed as

clinical stagingclinical subtypesDepressiondysfunctional cognitive schemasearly environmental exposuresfamily historyfunctioningneurocognitionpersonality traitspersonalization of treatmentphysical comorbiditiesprotective factorspsychiatric antecedentspsychiatric comorbiditiesquality of liferecent environmental exposuresseveritysymptom profile

Identifiers

PMID32931110
PMCPMC7491646
OpenAlexW3087001700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.