ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiecho Fat-Water Spiral MR Elastography With Distributed Encoding for Simultaneously Imaging Brain and Skull Displacement.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Interface geometry governs probe insertion mechanics and electrode deviation in layered brain-mimicking phantoms for deep brain stimulation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- A Systematic Study of GelMA-Carbopol Bioinks for High-Fidelity Extrusion 3D Bioprinting at Physiological Temperatures.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Mechanical properties of the developing brain in a model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and relationships to perineuronal net integrity.Brain research · 2026Article
- Measuring Brain Stiffness in Normal Adults According to Age and Sex Using Virtual MR Elastography: A Preliminary Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Reliable AI Platform for Monitoring BCI Caused Brain Injury and Providing Real-Time Protection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Neuromechanobiology: Bridging Mechanobiology and Neuroscience Through Evidence and Open Questions.Cells · 2026Review
- Hippocampal tissue mechanics are sensitive to fluctuations in oestrogen across the rat oestrous cycle.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Hippocampal relational memory and spatial reconstruction: where are we at and where are we bound?Frontiers in cognition · 2026Review
- Noninvasive mapping of shear strain predicts the anatomical distribution of mild traumatic brain injury.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Multimodal characterization of intracranial biomechanics in a 3D biofidelic head surrogate.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Multifrequency MR elastography for grading inflammation in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a pilot study.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Brain age prediction and early neurodegeneration detection using contrastive learning on brain biomechanics: a retrospective, multicentre study.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Mechanical characterization of brain tissue: experimental techniques, human testing considerations, and perspectives.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Inconsistencies in the Brain's Conventional Ex Vivo Mechanical Experiments.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Performance and Repeatability of Poroelastic and Poroviscoelastic Models in Intrinsic MR Elastography.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Average Biomechanical Responses of the Human Brain Grouped by Age and Sex.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- MR Elastography for Classification of Focal Liver Lesions Using Viscoelastic Parameters: A Pilot Study Based on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Activations.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- The pulsing brain: state of the art and an interdisciplinary perspective.Interface focus · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standard anatomical atlases are common in neuroimaging because they facilitate data analyses and comparisons across subjects and studies. The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized human brain atlas based on the physical mechanical properties (i.e., tissue viscoelasticity) of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). MRE is a phase contrast-based MRI method that quantifies tissue viscoelasticity noninvasively and in vivo thus providing a macroscopic representation of the microstructural constituents of soft biological tissue. The development of standardized brain MRE atlases are therefore beneficial for comparing neural tissue integrity across populations. Data from a large number of healthy, young adults from multiple studies collected using common MRE acquisition and analysis protocols were assembled (N = 134; 78F/ 56 M; 18-35 years). Nonlinear image registration methods were applied to normalize viscoelastic property maps (shear stiffness, μ, and damping ratio, ξ) to the MNI152 standard structural template within the spatial coordinates of the ICBM-152. We find that average MRE brain templates contain emerging and symmetrized anatomical detail. Leveraging the substantial amount of data assembled, we illustrate that subcortical gray matter structures, white matter tracts, and regions of the cerebral cortex exhibit differing mechanical characteristics. Moreover, we report sex differences in viscoelasticity for specific neuroanatomical structures, which has implications for understanding patterns of individual differences in health and disease. These atlases provide reference values for clinical investigations as well as novel biophysical signatures of neuroanatomy. The templates are made openly available (github.com/mechneurolab/mre134) to foster collaboration across research institutions and to support robust cross-center comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.