SynthesisObesity surgery2021
Procedural Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Previous Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of choledocholithiasis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and pooled proportion meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison between Enteroscopy-, Laparoscopy- and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Effect of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Lithotomy Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Pain and Prognosis of Patients with Gallstones and Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the procedural outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting procedural outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted ERCP in patients with previous RYGB. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Fixed-effect and random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data.
resultsA total of 17 case series, enrolling 256 patients, were included. The mean age of included patients was 49. The mean procedure time was 137 min (95% CI 102-172). In terms of procedural success rates, the overall technical success was 95.3% (95% CI 92.5-97.5, I
conclusionsLaparoscopic-assisted ERCP seems to be feasible, effective, and a safe method to access the biliary tract in patients with previous RYGB as indicated by high technical success rates and low complication rates. There is a need for comparative evidence regarding outcomes of laparoscopic ERCP in comparison with alternative treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.