ReviewBiophysical reviews2020
Invasive and non-invasive therapies for Alzheimer's disease and other amyloidosis.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling APOE4's Role in Alzheimer's Disease: Pathologies and Therapeutic Strategies.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing: A Novel Approach Towards Alzheimer's Disease Treatment.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease through Non-Invasive Biomarkers: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Therapeutic non-invasive brain treatments in Alzheimer's disease: recent advances and challenges.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: New hope for Alzheimer's disease therapeutics.Journal of advanced research · 2022Review
- Biophysical Reviews: a Q1 ranked journal in biophysics and structural biology.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in medical science have facilitated in extending human lives. The increased life expectancy, though, has come at a cost. The cases of an aging population suffering from degenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD) are presently at its all-time high. Amyloidosis disorders such as AD are triggered by an abnormal transition of soluble proteins into their highly ordered aggregated forms. The landscape of amyloidosis treatment remains unchanged, and there is no cure for such disorders. However, an increased understanding of the mechanism of amyloid self-assembly has given hope for a possible therapeutic solution. In this review, we will discuss the current state of molecular and non-molecular options for therapeutic intervention of amyloidosis. We highlight the efficacy of non-invasive physical therapies as possible alternatives to their molecular counterparts. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.