Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32930955›Full record

ArticleAmbio2020

Comparing nutrient reference concentrations in Nordic countries with focus on lowland rivers.

Eva Skarbøvik, Jukka Aroviita, Jens Fölster, Anne Lyche Solheim, Katarina Kyllmar, Katri Rankinen, Brian Kronvang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva SkarbøvikNorwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO, P.O. Box. 115, 1431, Ås, Norway. eva.skarbovik@nibio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-5441
Jukka AroviitaFreshwater Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, PO Box 413, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
Jens FölsterDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7050, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne Lyche SolheimNorwegian Institute of Water Research, NIVA, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Katarina KyllmarDepartment of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7014, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Katri RankinenBiodiversity Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Brian KronvangDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference conditions of water bodies are defined as the natural or minimal anthropogenically disturbed state. We compared the methods for determining total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations in rivers in Finland, Norway and Sweden as well as the established reference conditions and evaluated the possibility for transfer and harmonisation of methods. We found that both methods and values differed, especially for lowland rivers with a high proportion of agriculture in the catchment. Since Denmark has not yet set reference conditions for rivers, two of the Nordic methods were tested for Danish conditions. We conclude that some of the established methods are promising but that further development is required. We moreover argue that harmonisation of reference conditions is needed to obtain common benchmarks for assessing the impacts of current and future land use changes on water quality.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringRiversAgricultureFinlandNitrogenNorwayNutrientsPhosphorusScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSwedenNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusNordicNutrientsReference conditionsRiversWFD

Identifiers

PMID32930955
PMCPMC7502649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.