Trial reportDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020
[Surgical techniques in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma-a prospective investigation].
Trial report in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- S2k guideline basal cell carcinoma of the skin (update 2023).Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2024Guideline
- [Micrographic controlled surgery in everyday dermatosurgery].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasal cell carcinomas are the most frequent epithelial skin tumors and a frequent indication for dermatological interventions. Despite the establishment of drug treatment options, surgery is still the treatment of choice. Various options are available ranging from curettage to complex dermatosurgical procedures. In addition to the main aspect of low local recurrence rates, esthetic factors and the number of procedures are also important for the choice of treatment.
methodsIn this study 347 patients with 398 basal cell carcinomas (nodular type, diameter up to 10 mm) were prospectively examined. The patients were randomized into two treatment arms: in one group the tumor was treated by ring curettage and in the other group the tumor was excised. Patients who underwent 3D histologically controlled surgery due to basal cell carcinoma during the same investigation period served as controls.
resultsThe highest local recurrence rate was observed after curettage (14.0%), whereas the group with 3D histology had the lowest recurrence rate (0.9%, p < 0.001). In the 3D group, more re-excisions were required to achieve complete tumor clearance compared to the group who underwent excisions with serial section histology. Patients rated the esthetic outcome best after curettage. The median follow-up was 3.9 years.
conclusionThe choice of surgical treatment for small nodular basal cell carcinomas depends on individual circumstances. Excisions controlled by 3D histology with wound closure after complete tumor clearance showed the lowest recurrence rate in our study; however, curettage is also a possible surgical treatment option with minimal effort and an acceptable recurrence rate, which can lead to good esthetic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.