ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2021
[Is compression therapy contraindicated for lower leg erysipelas? : Results of a retrospective analysis].
Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treating cellulitis promptly with compression therapy reduces C-reactive protein-levels and symptoms - a randomized-controlled trial.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Trial
- [Erysipelas saltans].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Indications, contraindications, side effects, general assessment, and outlook for the future: An International Compression Club survey.Phlebology · 2024Article
- [Conservative treatment of varicose veins].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many medical expert recommendations and guidelines, the use of compression therapy for acute erysipelas is designated as a contraindication. Due to the sometimes massive oedema, compression therapy is nevertheless used in some clinics. This led to the question whether compression therapy for erysipelas of the lower leg actually leads to complications due to the acute infection and thus represents a contraindication. For the period 01 January 2018 to 30 June 2019, the records of 56 inpatients with acute erysipelas of the lower leg who received compression therapy in addition to systemic antibiotic therapy were retrospectively evaluated. The duration of inpatient treatment, the infection parameters determined as part of the ward routine and any complications that occurred were evaluated. While treated as inpatients the blood parameters for infection clearly dropped. Compression therapy was started on admission day in 92.9% of patients and continued until discharge. None of the patients showed an increase in fever or clinical signs of sepsis during the hospital stay. In this retrospective analysis it could be shown for the first time that compression therapy does not cause a clinical worsening or trigger a septic clinical picture in patients with acute erysipelas. Therefore, the authors consider the declaration of acute erysipelas as contraindication for compression therapy as not justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.