ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020
[Interdisciplinary neurovascular networks: state of the art].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interdisciplinary neurovascular networks in Germany: update 2025.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- [Specialization of Acute Stroke Care in Germany: Structural Changes During 2006-2017].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Article
- Acute ischemic stroke care in Germany - further progress from 2016 to 2019.Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn order to treat the complete spectrum of neurovascular diseases at a high level of quality, which goes beyond the purely acute treatment of stroke, the German Stroke Society (DSG) together with the German Societies for Neurosurgery and Neuroradiology developed a certification procedure for neurovascular networks (NVN). Structurally, a NVN consists of a coordinating center with at least three neurovascular network partners with a certified stroke unit. From 2018 to 2020 a total of 15 NVN have so far been audited and certified according to this new standard.
objectiveHow efficient are the NVN? Are high standards maintained? MATERIAL AND
methodsThe reports of the audits were analyzed. The data were taken from the period 2017-2019.
resultsThe 15 NVN treated a total of 86,510 stroke patients in the years examined and were networked with a total of 107 partner clinics, which were situated an average of 25 km from the coordinating center and transferred a total of 2726 patients. The coordinating centers performed 2463 thrombectomies and treated 2383 patients with nontraumatic intracerebral bleeding. In 712 patients with acute aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages endovascular treatment was carried out and clipping in 401. The audit was successful in the majority of the NVN.
conclusionThe certification process of NVN has been successfully established and the audits proved to be a useful instrument for quality control and improvement. The 15 NVN are highly efficient and treat more than one quarter of stroke patients in German stroke units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.