Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32930794›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Making community-supported agriculture accessible to low-income families: findings from the Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids process evaluation.

Jennifer A Garner, Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts, Karla L Hanson, Alice S Ammerman, Jane Kolodinsky, Marilyn H Sitaker, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A GarnerSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Stephanie B Jilcott PittsBrody School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Karla L HansonMaster of Public Health Program, Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Alice S AmmermanGillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jane KolodinskyDepartment of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Marilyn H SitakerEcological Agriculture and Food Systems, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA, USA.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Cornell University · USEast Carolina University · USTexas A&M University · USThe Evergreen State College · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized trial of Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK) was initiated across 4 states and 12 farms to test whether cost-offset community-supported agriculture (CO-CSA) could improve diet quality among children in low-income families. Intervention households purchased a 50% subsidized share of local produce and were invited to nine complimentary nutrition classes. The purpose of this study was to assess F3HK reach, dose, and fidelity via a mixed methods process evaluation. Screening and enrollment records indicated reach; study records and postlesson educator surveys tracked dose delivered; CSA pickup logs, lesson sign-in sheets, postseason participant surveys, and postlesson caregiver surveys assessed dose received; and coordinator audits and educator surveys tracked fidelity. Educator interviews contextualized findings. The results of this study were as follows. Reach: enrolled caregivers (n = 305) were older (p = .005) than eligible nonenrollees (n = 243) and more likely to be female (p < .001). Dose: mean CSA season was 21 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 19-23). Median CSA pickup was 88% of the weeks (IQR: 40-100). All sites offered each class at least once. Most adults (77%) and children (54%) attended at least one class; few attended all. Eighty-two percent of caregivers indicated that their household consumed most or all produce. Median lesson activity ratings were 5/5 ("very useful"). Fidelity: CSA locations functioned with integrity to project standards. Educators taught 92% of activities but frequently modified lesson order. This study demonstrates the feasibility of pairing a CO-CSA intervention with nutrition education across geographically dispersed sites. Greater integration of intervention elements and clearer allowance for site-level modifications, particularly for educational elements, may improve intervention dose and, ultimately, impact.

Indexed as

FarmsPovertyAdolescentAdultAgricultureChildChild, PreschoolDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleNutritional StatusCommunity-supported agricultureLocal foodLow-income householdsMixed methodsNutrition educationProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32930794
PMCPMC8033590
OpenAlexW3087199521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.