Observational studyAnesthesiology2020
Volatile versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cancer Prognosis in Patients Having Digestive Cancer Surgery.
Observational study in Anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival outcomes following total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia in esophagogastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Regional anesthesia might reduce recurrence and metastasis rates in adult patients with cancers after surgery: a meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of different anaesthetic techniques on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer after resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Association Between Anesthesia Delivered During Tumor Resection and Cancer Survival: a Systematic Review of a Mixed Picture with Constant Themes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Pooled it
- Randomized controlled trial of the effect of general anesthetics on postoperative recovery after minimally invasive nephrectomy.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Transcriptome analysis reveals the differential inflammatory effects between propofol and sevoflurane during lung cancer resection: a randomized pilot study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- Sevoflurane-Associated Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Promote Aggressive Phenotypes in Cervical Cancer Cells with Concurrent DG Remodeling and EGFR/PKCα/NF-κB Activation.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Inhalational versus total intravenous anesthesia in noncardiac surgery: a comparative review of clinical outcomes.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Review
- General and Regional Anaesthesia in Cancer Surgery: A 20-year Bibliometric Analysis.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- Relationship between volatile anesthetics and functional outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Article
- Propofol TIVA vs. inhalational anesthesia for spine surgery: in‑hospital mortality and postoperative complications in a nationwide Korean cohort.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Total intravenous or inhalational volatile anaesthesia and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a Swedish national registry study.Anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of perioperative analgesia on postoperative chronic analgesic prescriptions in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery: A retrospective observational study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Sedated and unsedated gastroscopy has no influence on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The impact of perioperative anesthesia management-induced immunosuppression on postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Anesthetic Approaches and Their Impact on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Comparison of postoperative outcomes after cranial neurosurgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Article
- The Role of Anesthetic Management in Lung Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious experimental and clinical studies have shown that anesthetic agents have varying effects on cancer prognosis; however, the results were inconsistent among these studies. The authors compared overall and recurrence-free survival in patients given volatile or intravenous anesthesia for digestive tract cancer surgery.
methodsThe authors selected patients who had elective esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hepatectomy, cholecystectomy, pancreatectomy, colectomy, and rectal cancer surgery from July 2010 to March 2018 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Patients were divided into a volatile anesthesia group (desflurane, sevoflurane, or isoflurane with/without nitrous oxide) and a propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia group. The authors hypothesized that total intravenous anesthesia is associated with greater overall and recurrence-free survival than volatile anesthesia. Subgroup analyses were performed for each type of surgery.
resultsThe authors identified 196,303 eligible patients (166,966 patients in the volatile anesthesia group and 29,337 patients in the propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia group). The numbers (proportions) of death in the volatile anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia groups were 17,319 (10.4%) and 3,339 (11.4%), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.07; P = 0.28) or recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.03; P = 0.59), whereas instrumental variable analyses showed a slight difference in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98; P = 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference in overall or recurrence-free survival between the groups in any type of surgery.
conclusionsOverall and recurrence-free survival were similar between volatile and intravenous anesthesia in patients having digestive tract surgery. Selection of the anesthetic approach for these patients should be based on other factors. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.